IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Official : Daily Mail accuse POLICE of a COVER UP about MOAT
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Locked Out |
Innocent Accused wrote:
Afraid you missed the point entirely LO.At least JK got it.
I have no intention of getting into an argument here,or even insulting anyone,it's purely a bit of fun to put people's actions into perspective.
Umm... sorry, I took myself a little too seriously {a failing of mine, I fear... comes of being constitutionally incapable of taking anything else seriously}. Anyway, you have my apologies. |
|
Toxic Twin |
I would like to repeat the issue I have with this thread and that is it's the title.
"Daily Mail accuse POLICE of a COVER UP about MOAT"
They didn't make any accusations they just reported that the family wanted another post mortum and that the family believed there there might have been a cover up. In this eposide the family may well be right and there are some serious questions that the police have to answer.
If The Daily Mail actually did come out and accuse the police of a cover up that would be a completely different story. Every day Newpapers report that inquests and investigations have been requested, it doesn't mean the paper supports that side of the argument.
I genuinely don't beieve I am being pedantic here as the title of the post is fundemently wrong and misleading. I find it particularily galling that someone like BR who is always complaining about how the media is twisting the truth does the same when suiting their purpose. |
|
Innocent Accused |
Afraid you missed the point entirely LO.At least JK got it.
I have no intention of getting into an argument here,or even insulting anyone,it's purely a bit of fun to put people's actions into perspective. |
|
Locked Out |
Innocent Accused wrote:
This whole farce reminds me of the Pink Panther films.
BR as the well meaning,but scatty Inspector Clouseau.Locked Out is rapidly becoming Herbert Lom's character Dreyfus,driven to insanity by his hatred of Br...while Toxic Twin/Graham S et al lies in hiding waiting to ambush BR Clouseau from under his various disguises,just like Cato Fong his manservant.
Be nice to see us all doing our own thing,not fighting amongst ourselves 
OK then. Let me me if I have this right. In a nutshell what you are saying is this; it's perfectly reasonable and oojah-cum-spiff for you to accuse me of "being driven to insanity" by my "hatred of BR", yet it's not equally acceptable for Graham S to accuse BR of being driven to insanity by his hatred of the police? Such sophistry deserves to be answered.
It is true that I engage rigorously with the NWO debate. But I hope that my "New World Order" thread of last night demonstrates that it's my intention to attack the ridiculous arguments rather than the poster who advances them. I notice that there are no replies to that thread as yet, while this one has garnered further contributions. That's not sour grapes, it's an accurate reflection which could mean one or several things. Maybe people can't be bothered to read a moderately lengthy piece. Maybe people are too lazy to give it the thought it perhaps doesn't deserve anyway... maybe it'll grow into a positive behemoth of interesting and controversial debate. Whatever becomes of it, it should be apparent that my problem is with BR's NWO claims rather than BR himself.
Neither is your charge of being "driven to insanity" borne out by any of my other postings. You'll find - I hope, at least, that you will - that there is little in any of them to suggest that I'm anything other than fair minded. So less of the "insanity" bit please. It's unfounded, unfair, and actually offensive. You can't possibly have not expected me to reply to your charge robustly.
I'd also refute the idea that rigorous debate is in some way equable with "falling out among ourselves". I'm sure you'll agree that there are many boards out there which specialise in abusive postings. I'd suggest that we have, in our argumentative way, a rare characteristic, one of being able to represent a cross section of views in an adult way regardless of either personal circumstances or history. Once upon a time I was a sex offender. In many peoples' eyes I still am one. Yet I can post here as an equal because here it's the intellect which is King. Who you are is who you are and it's what you are now that counts rather than what yo have done in the past. I like that. Should we ever become a board where the norm is happy clappy consensus... where people won't argue their corner because they're afraid to rock the boat... I'll be out of here because the place will have become just another retreat for tired people to have a nice soothing chat. A barren wasteland where strong opinion is neither sought nor valued.
I'd hope that the day when that description fits KoH never arrives. But should JK ever suggest that that is what he would like all he has to do is say so. I'll be the first to desist from posting any further "insane" views.
|
|
JK2006 |
Spot on LO; The Tipsheet is meant to be dedicated to music and Your Views all other topics.
And spot on IA - the time has come to move on. |
|
|
|
|
