King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]jim wrote:[/b]
[quote]Thanks BR, you write:

"Therefore, surely a PRIVATE PROSECUTION Of this POLICEMAN is the way forward. I will give money to a fund if they decide to go ahead. Would you ?"

I had the same thought. I was going to contact my lawyer friend and ask just feasible it would be. I think there would be a huge groundswell of support for it.

From what little I know, there are three considerations at least. Firstly, the crown has the power to take over a private prosecution and close it down if they find it to be in the public interest to do so. I don't think they would have the brass neck to close down this one though.

Second, the money you have to stump up includes costs if you lose and the judge awards them to the accused. These can be mighty considerable by most people's standards.

Third, who to prosecute? The identity of the assailant is being cloaked, is it not?

This whole thing just makes me sick to the stomach. I know I'm not the only one.

Best Wishes,
Jim[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: TOMLINSON POLICE MURDER verdict today from the CPS
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Jim	Sorry. Forget my third point. It appears the officer's name is PC Simon Harwood. I was wrong. It's not being cloaked. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Ian_Tomlinson
jim	Thanks BR, you write: "Therefore, surely a PRIVATE PROSECUTION Of this POLICEMAN is the way forward. I will give money to a fund if they decide to go ahead. Would you ?" I had the same thought. I was going to contact my lawyer friend and ask just feasible it would be. I think there would be a huge groundswell of support for it. From what little I know, there are three considerations at least. Firstly, the crown has the power to take over a private prosecution and close it down if they find it to be in the public interest to do so. I don't think they would have the brass neck to close down this one though. Second, the money you have to stump up includes costs if you lose and the judge awards them to the accused. These can be mighty considerable by most people's standards. Third, who to prosecute? The identity of the assailant is being cloaked, is it not? This whole thing just makes me sick to the stomach. I know I'm not the only one. Best Wishes, Jim
veritas	JK2006 wrote: I'm afraid I'm with the CPS - he was clearly killed by the police but it clearly cannot be proved. That's the law. Look I can prove I was out of the country when one of my conviction crimes was meant to have taken place, The Government say it's not when but whether that matters. I say in cases of consent one day - even one hour - makes a difference. But at the end of the day the law is the law. And, I submit, an ass. I think the family would have good case for a private prosecution against the police and officer. Must be done..they just get away with too much.
BR	Evidence : 1. CCTV of a brutal assault on Tomlinson. 2. Eyewitnesses to this assault 3. Tomlinson struggles down the road and collapses. 4. Eyewitnesses to this as well 5. Tomlinson dies of internal bleeding 6. Eyewitnesses to this. 7. The MET POLICE claim he had a heart attack and dont mention the assault 8. Prima Facae case for PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE against the MET - with evidence from the press briefings 9. Post Mortem claims he had a heart attack - organised by the Police 10. Second and Third Post Mortems show he died from internal bleeding proving that the Police PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE for a second time 11. CPS decide not to prosecute. Therefore, surely a PRIVATE PROSECUTION Of this POLICEMAN is the way forward. I will give money to a fund if they decide to go ahead. Would you ? It is time the EVIDENCE was presented in public. The CPS now represent the CRIMINALS in society not the people. This is now proved beyond any doubt at all. Cases go to court on ALLEGATIONS alone - needing no medical or forensic evidence. This is wrong. Totally wrong. The POLICE are bang out of order and so are the CPS. This could lead to RIOTS in the STREETS and more MOAT situations.
In The Know	Jim wrote: "I'm afraid I'm with the CPS - he was clearly killed by the police but it clearly cannot be proved. That's the law." But whilever the police "control" the situation - and control who views / films / records it ... they will also always "control" the "evidence" (and what is allowed to emerge). British Justice is DEAD. RIP