King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]veritas wrote:[/b]
[quote][b]steveimp wrote:[/b]
[quote]As for Huntley's other 'crimes', well he wasn't actually prosecuted for any of them was he, it was treated as more less gossip by Humberside Police?

Don't get me wrong, I am not supporting Huntley at all, however there is a lot about this case that strikes me as odd right from the very beginning.  When Huntley was first arrested, I have always had this nagging doubt in my head.  He just seemed to be the 'perfect' person for the Police to nab for a case that they simply had to solve.

In fact, I did ring up the Operations Room when the investigation was going on because I had seen two girls with a strange looking bloke walking through a part of Cambridgeshire a few hours after they were reported as missing.[/quote]

that is fascinating.
 I doubt we would ever know what went on in an operation like that and I have sympathy for police involved.
 How anyone can harm a child is quite beyond me and the thought of discovering a murdered child's body is quite beyond my comprehension. We should make allowance at times for the police..they do have extremely difficult jobs.

But I agree..even the most wretched of criminals deserves protection. It is what makes the difference between us and the uncivilised.

I am humbled [b]In The Know[/b] at the wonderful award. My preferred prize is a crate of Bollinger..no need to deliver , I will collect. Tell me the time and place. :woohoo:[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Tabloid outrage at Huntley's attempts to sue prison service
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
veritas	your reply steveimp relates to the Sarah's Law thread. Would not the better way to handle the safe guarding of children would be for anyone..absolutely anyone who works with children be made to get a license from a formal body where the checks are done. That way there would be no embarassment for those who didn't pass..surely much better than the public being able to have someone looked up and they may have commited some small act...peeing in public..arrested and convicted..hence Sex Offender status but the message goes out they are a kiddy fidler.
Jim	Thanks BR, you write: "When you consider maybe 1 in 3 police are Paedophiles..." This is quite true, and a very illuminating contribution to our understanding of what is possible. The proposition following the "maybe" is capable of being imagined as true. Prefacing it with "maybe" therefore forms a true statement. Included in a further list of true statements for consideration are: 1. Maybe there is a god 2. Maybe 8 + 5 = 13.25 under suitable atmospheric and altitude conditions 3. Maybe I'm the King of France 4. Maybe hamburgers are ten feet wide 5. Maybe there is no god 6. Maybe nothing exists independently of representation 7. Maybe granite is soft and pliable 8. Maybe no police are paedophiles Best Wishes, Jim
steveimp	This is another site about the Huntley/Carr conspiracy - www.justjustice.org/ If you look for Joe Vialls on Google you may find his original work; he suggests the real perpetrators of the murders were associated with USAF Lakenheath, which is where the bodies of the two girls were found. Out of all the crimes that Huntley was accused of, he was only ever charged and convicted of burglary, which should have been enough to have seen him not get that job to start with at the school.
veritas	steveimp wrote: As for Huntley's other 'crimes', well he wasn't actually prosecuted for any of them was he, it was treated as more less gossip by Humberside Police? Don't get me wrong, I am not supporting Huntley at all, however there is a lot about this case that strikes me as odd right from the very beginning. When Huntley was first arrested, I have always had this nagging doubt in my head. He just seemed to be the 'perfect' person for the Police to nab for a case that they simply had to solve. In fact, I did ring up the Operations Room when the investigation was going on because I had seen two girls with a strange looking bloke walking through a part of Cambridgeshire a few hours after they were reported as missing. that is fascinating. I doubt we would ever know what went on in an operation like that and I have sympathy for police involved. How anyone can harm a child is quite beyond me and the thought of discovering a murdered child's body is quite beyond my comprehension. We should make allowance at times for the police..they do have extremely difficult jobs. But I agree..even the most wretched of criminals deserves protection. It is what makes the difference between us and the uncivilised. I am humbled In The Know at the wonderful award. My preferred prize is a crate of Bollinger..no need to deliver , I will collect. Tell me the time and place.
steveimp	As for Huntley's other 'crimes', well he wasn't actually prosecuted for any of them was he, it was treated as more less gossip by Humberside Police? Don't get me wrong, I am not supporting Huntley at all, however there is a lot about this case that strikes me as odd right from the very beginning. When Huntley was first arrested, I have always had this nagging doubt in my head. He just seemed to be the 'perfect' person for the Police to nab for a case that they simply had to solve. In fact, I did ring up the Operations Room when the investigation was going on because I had seen two girls with a strange looking bloke walking through a part of Cambridgeshire a few hours after they were reported as missing.