King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]veritas wrote:[/b]
[quote][b]Bruce Bruce wrote:[/b]
[quote][b]veritas wrote:[/b]
[quote]here is that link for the story about an old lady who wants to 'have' a young boy :

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/kim-would-have-bieber-if-he-was-legal/story-e6frewyr-1225910066569

shouldn't she at least be questioned by police ?

should this story be in the 'entertainment' section or the 'pedo' section ?[/quote]##Questioned for what though? There is no crime. Paedophilia (sexual attratction to prepubescents) is not illegal (assuming Bieber is even prepubescents). Had Kardasian acted on her inclinations, there could be a case of sexual abuse in certain States.[/quote]

Well of course she shouldn't be questioned but it is a good example of how the media treats this as a huge amount of fun and simply reports the story when at other times it weighs in full of condemnation and drives the actions of the community.

But tell me this : if a man aged 35 announced he wanted to 'have' a 15 year old boy or girl (who looked younger) would he not be pilloried across the tabloid pages and denounced as a predator ?.

In fact if it was certain US states-like California where Kardashan lives and the legal age is 18 I have no doubt he would be questioned.

Afterall -she has announced that she would lie to 'have' him and the only thing that stops her is that it s\would not be legal.

Maybe you have never seen all those US TV shows where so-called 'predators' are attracted to a house and met by a 30 year old cop posing as a teen ?

Thought crime [i]is real [/i]and carries penalties.

And since his birthday is almost upon us..what is the difference between Kim and Michael Jackson?[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: disgusting pedo talk about young boy from old person
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Blackit	Angel wrote: Whats the problem with an older bird fancying a 16 year old? Can someone please explain? I'll explain for you. If a male celebrity said the same thing it would likely be the end of his career. A woman saying it and it doesn't even raise an eyebrow. Also, the definition of child porn is <18 everywhere these days. It's therefore risky (at least for a man) to admit that under 18's are attractive. Furthermore, the language she openly used - 'If he was legal'. In other words, she's admitting being attracted to somebody she thinks is underage (an is in many american states). It's like a British male celebrity saying 'I'd definitely date that 15 year old if it wasn't illegal. BTW, she hasn't said or done anything wrong. It's just the hypocricy of the media. Sorry for missing this post earlier but I was on holiday.
JK2006	Just to end this discussion... popdash.com/news/1518/kim-kardashian-say...dating-justin-bieber
veritas	Bruce Bruce wrote: veritas wrote: here is that link for the story about an old lady who wants to 'have' a young boy : www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/...frewyr-1225910066569 shouldn't she at least be questioned by police ? should this story be in the 'entertainment' section or the 'pedo' section ?##Questioned for what though? There is no crime. Paedophilia (sexual attratction to prepubescents) is not illegal (assuming Bieber is even prepubescents). Had Kardasian acted on her inclinations, there could be a case of sexual abuse in certain States. Well of course she shouldn't be questioned but it is a good example of how the media treats this as a huge amount of fun and simply reports the story when at other times it weighs in full of condemnation and drives the actions of the community. But tell me this : if a man aged 35 announced he wanted to 'have' a 15 year old boy or girl (who looked younger) would he not be pilloried across the tabloid pages and denounced as a predator ?. In fact if it was certain US states-like California where Kardashan lives and the legal age is 18 I have no doubt he would be questioned. Afterall -she has announced that she would lie to 'have' him and the only thing that stops her is that it s\would not be legal. Maybe you have never seen all those US TV shows where so-called 'predators' are attracted to a house and met by a 30 year old cop posing as a teen ? Thought crime is real and carries penalties. And since his birthday is almost upon us..what is the difference between Kim and Michael Jackson?
Bruce Bruce	veritas wrote: here is that link for the story about an old lady who wants to 'have' a young boy : www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/...frewyr-1225910066569 shouldn't she at least be questioned by police ? should this story be in the 'entertainment' section or the 'pedo' section ?##Questioned for what though? There is no crime. Paedophilia (sexual attratction to prepubescents) is not illegal (assuming Bieber is even prepubescents). Had Kardasian acted on her inclinations, there could be a case of sexual abuse in certain States.
veritas	that's a 'chav' not a chaz. or as BR would say ..a CHAV !!