Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: POLICE campaign against TEACHERS
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
veritas |
I believe BR is on to something and there needs to be a Royal Commission into all police actions and the very way we deal with the soul-destroying subject of child abuse which is rampant throughout Britain.
And by child abuse I mean the vast majority of which is by neglect, physical and mental abuse and the least form-sexual.
One shining example shows that the matter is treated with utter madness :
2 people who willfully and deliberately abandoned their 3 small children in a foreign land in an unlocked apartment so that one has met a fate so terrible that we cannot imagine...are lauded by the main child protection unit ( CEOPS) almost as parents of the year.
And the father is invited to speak to policing groups...a father who by all legal definitions, willfully neglected his children.
The system is bust...prove me wrong ! |
|
Chris Retro |
Not involving any kidsex allegations, but another strange story involving a teacher, a non-crime & a mysterious "tip-off"
www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/news/H...-detail/article.html |
|
Plissken |
Jim wrote:
Thanks Plissken, you write:
"Quickly followed by yet another offer to enter into correspondence on behalf of someone else."
No. I was offering to correspond on my own behalf. I'm not sure what I said to cause the confusion.
Best Wishes,
Jim
Jim, as Malcolm Tucker once famously said, 'Don't start with the fucking semantics shit again.
You know what I call "semantics"? Wank!' |
|
Jim |
Thanks BR,
I think it would be a good idea in future to use copy and paste.
Obviously there is a difference between a "should" statement and an "is" statement. I cannot, in good conscience, waste any more time on someone who refuses to see it.
Best Wishes,
Jim |
|
BR |
Jim wrote:
Thanks BR,
You quoted me correctly the second time, but not the first. There is an important difference between the two.
Best Wishes,
Jim
Sorry for being pedantic but when did missing out two words count as a phrase meaning something else ?
The quote means exactly the same even if I missed out the words then and should. For instance the Police dont always say UK in their comments. It is the general meaning behind the phrase which gives it the meaning.
I see you have not denied that you are in or work for the Police in your comments - though you were quick to correct the omission of the two words.
Perhaps you can enlighten us ? maybe the postings on here have drawn your attention 
Anyhow thank you for pointing out the omission of two words - I will be more careful and cut and paste or learn to use the quote function in future  |
|
|
|
