cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Tomlinson's Police "killer" already sacked by Police TWICE for violence before.......
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know BR wrote:
Twice this thug had been sacked for serious violence.

Each time he returned to a DIFFERENT Police force.

What it shows is that the POLICE accept violent criminals into their profession and think nothing of it.


I saw a report last week (as a result of a BBC Freedom of Information request) which said that more than 2000 policemen in the UK had had THREE (or more) separate complaints made against them.

As it is standard police practise to "trawl" (ie invent) evidence to substanciate spurious complaints (in order to say that "if it happened more than once" ... "there is no smoke without fire" etc) then surely the very same logic should be applied TO the police.

That is ... if there have been three (or more !) complaints against a policeman there is surely something in it !!!
BR www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309147...tre-G20-tragedy.html

Twice this thug had been sacked for serious violence.

Each time he returned to a DIFFERENT Police force.

What it shows is that the POLICE accept violent criminals into their profession and think nothing of it.

In addition surely he should have been charged immediately after the G20 based on his previous record which they would have known.

Instead a COVER UP has taken place to keep this man out of the courts because of the damage it would do the UK Police Service IF the truth came out.

Well the real truth IS coming out now - we can see a pattern emerging of Police forces all around the UK covering up violent attacks on the public by their officers.

This must be the tip of an iceberg and I would hope people would now come forward and tell their stories about Police brutality.

It is true that if you discover "Police Crime" then they do their best to silence you. That is the way they keep their victims quiet and cover up such cases as this.

I have been saying this for years based on research and personal experience. The judicial system as a whole "Pulls together" when they are threatened......to cover up these sorts of things.

DE MENEZES was a textbook case where a combination of lies - spin - and help from their friends in the CPS stopped a case going to court. TOMLINSON likewise.

I would say that there are probably 100s of cases against Police which should go to court and never make it for the same reasons. In addition if someone witnesses Police violence etc then they may find themselves charged and in court - as part of the cover up to try and discredit their "evidence" - because courts rely on Character.

It is time for the POLICE to have independent boards to run them - and the IPCC should not have any EX Police officers in its ranks NOR Judges or CPS bodies. They should come from ordinary walks of life and have NO LINKS at all to the Police otherwise they cant be impartial.