cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Kill Someone : The New Defence is "They sexually attacked me"
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Bruce Bruce veritas wrote:
Hi Bruce Bruce !!

sorry but I would have to trawl the records to present real cases but in the last 10 years I can think of 3 gay murders where the defendants successfully claimed 'sexual assault' as a defense.

Perhaps they were genuine-all I know is the defendants were found either 'not guilty' of murder or received no custodial sentence.

Perhaps they were genuine-but when there is a raft of similar cases alarm bells ring !

Thanks Veritas but my question was for BR regarding the 'vicar' case
veritas Hi Bruce Bruce !!

sorry but I would have to trawl the records to present real cases but in the last 10 years I can think of 3 gay murders where the defendants successfully claimed 'sexual assault' as a defense.

Perhaps they were genuine-all I know is the defendants were found either 'not guilty' of murder or received no custodial sentence.

Perhaps they were genuine-but when there is a raft of similar cases alarm bells ring !
Bruce Bruce BR wrote:
The VICAR killing almost certainly was invented after the murder and the initial trial...and the guy was aquitted a few weeks ago.

Not sure about Oz of course.

Evidence in a sex case = allegation now. The law does not need forensics or eye witnesses. In fact a group of people can get together ( called Trawling in the old days ) make up a story and all agree the story and then that counts as evidence even if there is nothing else and sometimes even if the accused can prove they were in another country or place at the time !!

I don't know about the vicar case. Do you have a link so I can comment on the case?
BR The VICAR killing almost certainly was invented after the murder and the initial trial...and the guy was aquitted a few weeks ago.

Not sure about Oz of course.

Evidence in a sex case = allegation now. The law does not need forensics or eye witnesses. In fact a group of people can get together ( called Trawling in the old days ) make up a story and all agree the story and then that counts as evidence even if there is nothing else and sometimes even if the accused can prove they were in another country or place at the time !!
Bruce Bruce veritas wrote:
Have to say this defense has been used successfully several times in murder trials in Oz and in most cases there was no history or supporting evidence to support the claims.

I think you will see it on the increase if it's successful in the UK.


Do you have an example of sexual assault being successfully presented as a defence where there was no evidence?