IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: "The Jaguar at Luton" Proof 7.7 was inside job
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
steveimp |
There are some very strange questions to ask regarding the activities of 'the four':
Why drive to Luton? Were they meeting someone there?
Why take the train? Why not drive further into central London? Who cares about the congestion charge or leaving the car to the clampers?
Why the return tickets? |
|
JK2006 |
As I've got older and, I think, wiser I've discovered that, almost every time, the truth is a blurred combination of numerous things and there is always more to things than meets the eye.
Just as neither extreme is correct (the official story or the conspiracy theory), the reality is in the middle - much confusion, some corruption, some concealment, a lot of inefficiency and usually, most crucial of all - it has to be A GOOD STORY!
Some facts, some invention and a huge quantity of exaggeration. |
|
veritas |
I've no idea who did 7/7 or 9/11 but there is always a conspiracy..always.
Whether it's those involved according to the offical story or someone else.
The easiest way to confuse the truth though is to encourage other conspiracies and secret government agencies are excellent at that and have always done it.
D-Day in WW2 was one of the most famous conspiracies that fooled the entire German nation...why does anyone think governments simply packed up and decided not to engage anymore in conspircaies ?
You always have to think who benefits from a conspircay ...and ever since JFK every US president has basically towed the line.
Since 9/11 just about the entire West has given up many of it's freedoms for a threat that has killed less people than die on the roads in Tasmania in a year. |
|
Locked Out |
Sorry Plisk, but that's nothing to do with what The Truth s saying here. He {she?} says utterly zilch about JFK. And even if the JFK case was as open and shut as you believe {it isn't, otherwise the "truth" you claim to observe would not, after all these years, still be so very much up for grabs} and your presenting it here looks very much like the setting up of a straw man.
I believe The Truth's point to be more this {it's also a creed I would readily sign up to myself}:
You can honestly claim that sometimes our Intelligence services present us with a case which amounts to less that the full, honest truth. Black Ops are an established {and, some would say, essential} part of the counter-espionage canon. But to extrapolate that into "we don't know what really happened so we're perfectly justified in making up any story we like regardless of any of the real facts" is just plain crazy. There are many conspiracy theorists who will tell you that the suicide bombers who carried out the 7/7 attacks were actually non existent and the explosives had been planted under the carriages. I think I'd rather place my faith in the story told by yesterday's witness who lost both his legs and claimed to be an actual eyewitness. His story has - unfortunately for conspiracy theorists - more credence than any of those put forward by the "other" side.
We might like to believe that our security services know no boundaries when it comes to public deceptions. But that desire should not blind us to the possibility that what happened on 7th July 2005 was not an example of a government carrying out an act of terrorism on its own people. |
|
Plissken |
The Truth wrote:
[quote]steveimp wrote:
Whatever happened to people's brains?
Dear Mr. Truth,
In this world that we live in, there are some things that are simply too terrible to comprehend.
One is the notion that, for whatever reason, we may outlive our own children.
Another is the idea that a government, whose prime responsibility is the protection of its people, would ever perpetrate, or allow to be perpetrated, an act of terror on those people. For that reason, even when presented with irrefutable evidence to the contrary, most people simply refuse to believe it.
Sadly, history shows that our leaders are not always as benevolent (or as honest) as we would like them to be.
Take the assassination of JFK. Less than a year after rejecting the CIA’s infamous Operation Northwoods false flag operation, he was dead.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Even though the Zabrucker film CLEARLY shows the back of Kennedy’s head being blown off, consistent with being hit by a high velocity round fired from somewhere in front of the motorcade, the official story is that Oswald fired the final, fatal round from the book depository. Behind the motorcade.
By the way, if you want to see the effects of a gunshot wound to the head, pop onto YouTube and have a look at the lovely Blackwater mercenaries taking pot-shots at Iraqi civilians. Note how their heads tend to follow the trajectory of the bullet. They do no jerk off in the opposite direction.
As well as this, the official JFK story amazingly hinges on the Warren Commission’s single bullet theory, made famous in Oliver Stone’s JFK. I prefer the term magic bullet; because the feats that bullet performed that day defy all known laws of physics (much like the collapse of three, yes three, steel-framed skyscrapers on 9/11).
Anyway, the above points regarding JFK appear to offer conclusive proof that the official, lone gunman theory is bogus. This alone should alert anyone with a modicum of intelligence to the fact that someone might be telling porkies. Yet we allow the truth to be hidden from us.
Whatever happened to people’s brains? Indeed. |
|
|
|
|
