cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Cameron in China and Democracy
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Innocent Accused JK2006 wrote:
Possibly votes should only be given to those who pass exams in management of social services; but, of course, none of us would bother to take them and only the better looking candidates would win. Better media photo opportunity for a better story.

But JK,the best looking candidates often don't win,otherwise you'd have been keeping Maggie company in '79
veritas Prunella Minge wrote:
The problem is that we don't have democracy as such, we merely have populism. Populism is about everyone taking part and having a say. Democracy is about everyone taking part and striving to make the best judgment for the community. Democracy, therefore, requires huge investment in education and an effective means of circulating information, and nations have never been able to convince their citizens to pay for this. So democracy is a system that is always waiting for undemocratic people to fund it. It all goes back to education.

well said Mizz Minge.

although I say we are verging on corporatism/fascism
Prunella Minge People forget, but during the reform bill debates in the 19th century plenty of Liberals, including John Stuart Mill, were advocating double votes for university graduates because they took seriously the notion that political actors had to be intelligent, well-informed, responsible and virtuous. The sad thing is, today, one wouldn't look to universities for such qualities. You can coast to a 2:1 these days and still be no more than semi-literate.
JK2006 Possibly votes should only be given to those who pass exams in management of social services; but, of course, none of us would bother to take them and only the better looking candidates would win. Better media photo opportunity for a better story.
Prunella Minge The problem is that we don't have democracy as such, we merely have populism. Populism is about everyone taking part and having a say. Democracy is about everyone taking part and striving to make the best judgment for the community. Democracy, therefore, requires huge investment in education and an effective means of circulating information, and nations have never been able to convince their citizens to pay for this. So democracy is a system that is always waiting for undemocratic people to fund it. It all goes back to education.