cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Unbelievable
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
SJB I watched the video on the link. I think the copper was claiming that the woman was holding the door frame at about 00:15 and he was pulling her into the cell. Then, she let go and flew forward by accident.

If that's the case, then fair enough.

BUT

You can't see if she's holding the door frame because of the angle of the camera. So where is the new evidence over and above what was heard in the trial? I don't get it.
steveimp www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-11787126

The aptly named Justice Bean said "he didn't mean to do it."

Wonderful excuse in law!
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk