Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: 800 Strong Paramilitary Police can now arrest us - with no appeal
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Locked Out |
No reply again I see. It was only to be expected. Your silence is so much more eloquent than your words. |
|
veritas |
Prunella Minge wrote:
I think you'll find that 'tacit consent' has been a key element of liberalism since the days of John Locke, you conspiracy obsessive.
but everything in government by it's very nature is a conspiracy.
BR is our watchman !  |
|
Locked Out |
And as I have asked you to answer my questions I'll answer your own, which I'm sure you'll agree is only fair. Not that I expect you to reciprocate.
BR wrote:
Locked Out - but if it is the New World Order ( The Financial Banking Elite ) then why should I not say it is ?
And if it isn't {and you don't appear to be able to satisfy me that this "New" World Order you continue to bore us with is even "necessary" to this "Financial Banking Elite" who you claim have "enslaved mankind for 5,000 years if they've always been as powerful and all subsuming as you're always claiming} then you're wrong, something you seem unwilling to accept despite your repeated failures to convince me otherwise. I'll let you into a secret. The concept of a global elite controlling the world's markets and geopolitics was something I used to find personally quite compelling. No one has done more to convince me that this is the stuff of paranoid fantasy than you. So I really should put my thanks on record.
BR wrote:
can you suggest why we need yet another Police force ?
No. it seems pointless.
BR wrote:
We dont have a "European Army "
I'm aware of this.
BR wrote:
so why a Para Military Police Force.
I have no idea. But the world is full of pointless organisations. I'd suggest that they have more to do with bureaucratic desires rather than genuine despotism.
BR wrote:
The most famous Para Military Police Force which was run from Germany was the GESTAPO.
Ummm... the Gestapo was a civilian organisation, more the political arm of the police force. I think you mean the SD.
BR wrote:
As far as I can see this is the equivalent of the BLACK SHIRTS from Italy ( where it will be run from ).
At least they'll be able to eat well. Apart from that I have no idea why this is important.
BR wrote:
So we have a POLICE FORCE run from a former FASCIST country in the UK
If you believe that Italy is a fascist country now you'd better come right out and say it. Otherwise this is nothing at all to do with anything.
BR wrote:
and UK citizens have no right of appeal against arrest ?
Why not? How much right of appeal did this former slave trading and owning country give to the Africans we transported to the Americas in the 18th century? I'm aware that that is totally irrelevant, but you started it.
BR wrote:
how can that be right - fair - or needed ?
In all fairness I don't believe it can be. You appear to believe that in trying to hold you to account for your loony ideas I am in some way indicating support for something I am not.
BR wrote:
Can you additionally tell me which of the THREE political parties included this as a policy in their manifesto ?
None of them. I don't believe you will find anywhere in my posting history anything to suggest that I have any faith in any of the three parties to present us with anything like either the full picture or the whole truth. I'm not in the slightest bit surprised that things are happening we didn't vote for. Exactly how naive are you?
BR wrote:
The NWO ignore Democracy and these changes are brought in without reference to our democratic process. That is what I would call fascism.
You define an amorphous body as "fascist". Meanwhile you deny the fascism of a body {the English Defence League} which certainly does exist.Your "definitions" of fascism are no recommendations of anything. |
|
Locked Out |
Oh, I'm sure you believe all that guff you spout ad nauseum. Your big problem is that most of us don't believe a word you say. I notice, too that you failed to give even one answer on my NWO thread {and all power to the poster who in my absence attempted in vain to pursue you on the matter} to the fundamental question of why this all powerful group has so completely failed to secure its grip on mankind {5,000 years of enslavement according to you} up until now. A group with the resources you claim and the time you claim would have no need of a "new" world order because they'd already have everything utterly stitched up. That you can't understand why this is a huge flaw in your theory - and why it should {but doesn't} make alarm bells ring in your belief system - is central to the weakness of your arguments and that of every silly little mindwanking conspiracy theorist on the internet. You all think you have the answer. Yet such a simple question as this makes you go very, very quiet.
Closing down the internet would in an instant benefit two groups of people.
One is the sort of person who enjoys looking at pictures of dead people in general and executions in particular. The other is conspiracy theorists who would thereafter have slightly less than fuck all to do with their time and might therefore have to think or read something constructive instead of concentrating on having their minds so "open" that their brains fall out the back of their heads.
I'll ask you once again to answer the question. I'll bet you won't {ie can't}. And you've poisoned your mind with all this paranoid claptrap so badly that you can't even begin to see why the question is important, especially to you. |
|
Innocent Accused |
If these dinosaurs managed to eat David Icke they'd be well worth it  |
|
|
|
