cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Assange (of WikiLeaks) freed on bail !
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
veritas In The Know wrote:
Prunella Minge wrote:
Kirsty Wark's 'interview' with him on Newsnight tonight drove me crazy. She cannot resist talking over the top of people with that grating voice in order to 'prove' she's a tough cookie, and all she achieves is that we don't hear what the bloke says. Once or twice is okay but if you keep doing that it makes the whole interview incoherent. It's much more effective is to let the person speak and then respond with a pertinent question.

Agreed.
She kept asking him over and over again why he didn't go back (to Sweden) and "face the charges" - apparently quite ignorant of the fact that there AREN'T any charges to answer !

Why was she not (as an investigative journalist) asking the Swedish authorities what they are up to ?


Kristy Squawk is so ignorant she seems oblivious to the fact Assange was in Sweden for a month after the claims were made and repeatedly made himself available via his lawyers for questioning.

and why the fuck should he go back ?
Chris Retro Sadly the BBC being constantly under attack from Murdoch's Bitches means the quality of the BBC interviews with "controversial" figures has gone for a burton. Kirsty Wark is clearly a typical pseudo-intellectual scrub who is part of the conspiracy against the truth. Perhaps it's a shame she didn't upset some Serbian warlords too.
Jim Thanks ITK, you write:

"Why was she not (as an investigative journalist) asking the Swedish authorities what they are up to ?"

I have nothing to add to that, save to say it's an excellent question, and like all excellent questions, it won't go away for not being answered.

In other news, when pressed for an explanation as to why it could not simply take advantage of the wonderful invention by Alexander Graham Bell enabling people to speak at a distance without even raising their voices, officials for the Swedish government say they would do but they got their phone cut off last month after not paying their bill.

Best Wishes,
Jim

WARNING: May contain traces of irony
In The Know Prunella Minge wrote:
Kirsty Wark's 'interview' with him on Newsnight tonight drove me crazy. She cannot resist talking over the top of people with that grating voice in order to 'prove' she's a tough cookie, and all she achieves is that we don't hear what the bloke says. Once or twice is okay but if you keep doing that it makes the whole interview incoherent. It's much more effective is to let the person speak and then respond with a pertinent question.

Agreed.
She kept asking him over and over again why he didn't go back (to Sweden) and "face the charges" - apparently quite ignorant of the fact that there AREN'T any charges to answer !

Why was she not (as an investigative journalist) asking the Swedish authorities what they are up to ?
In The Know What did I say, veritas ?

USA preparing espionage charges -
news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Assang..._He_Is_Freed_On_Bail