Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Sex offenders win appeal against life on register
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
veritas |
there are few geniune Labour Party MPs left except a few old diehards-Tony Benn, George Galloway (Labour in spirit).
Tony Blair and his ilk destroyed the party. |
|
In The Know |
veritas wrote:
Not sure which policitian Balls is but he is quite wrong. The re-offending rate is no more than 5% worldwide- the lowest of all re-offending rates.
Let me help you !
Mr Balls is none other than Red Ed Mk 2 in other words, Ed Balls our "new" opposition Chancellor and the man who "assisted" Gordon Brown in wrecking the country's economy (but now decries anything that anyone does to put things right).
His wife, Mrs Balls, also calls herself Yvette Cooper and is Secretary of State for something-or-other.
BOTH have been investigated as they couldn't quite remember where their "home" was ! www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4214985.ece
You may also find the following interesting -
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1029410...es-pay-mortgage.html
Such nice hard working Labour politicians looking after all those poorer people ! |
|
veritas |
In The Know wrote:
veritas wrote:
My former cop friend in Oz ran one of these 'registers' and said it was a blatant waste of time and resourses as he spent all day checking up on people not committing a crime.
That lovely Mrs Load-of-Balls has just been speaking in the Commons -
from Sky News - "Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said MPs had "an obligation" to protect the public, especially children and other vulnerable groups, from sex offenders.
She said more than 25% of sex offenders went on to commit further serious crimes. The new system "must be extremely tough" to have the support of MPs, she added". news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Sex-Of...ex_Register_For_Life
So ... assuming her figures are right - 75% DO NOT go on to commit further crime but should be branded for life? (Even the 25% that she speaks of are not necessarily sex crimes either).
Not sure which policitian Balls is but he is quite wrong. The re-offending rate is no more than 5% worldwide- the lowest of all re-offending rates.
That doesn't mean there are not very dangerous people out there who probably need monitoring.
Note that most of the media have weaved this in with 'pedo' hysteria.
My objection is that by monitoring everyone , that leaves few resources for the very really bad nasty creatures who will attack again.
The copper you mention ITK really defeats his own argument and is typical of the hysterical thought.
If the "leopard doesn't change it's spots"-what the hell will some register do ?. A crime can be committed within a minute and as the jails are full of people re-offending-his argument is nonsensical.
After spending all this week on a campaign which was finally successful just this evening, I get very very angry about so-called 'child protection' self appointed experts who are obsessed with sex.
Our group managed to finally embarrass the government into relenting and allowing a 9 year old boy whose mother, father and siblings died in the awful Christmas Island "boat people" -tragedy to come and stay with his Sydney relatives after he attended his families funeral and Immigration sent him back to Christmas Island.
Can you imaginme his state of mind in a concentration camp full of other traunmatised refugees ?
Still the same c*nts who screech about pedos are ranting about "illegal" (which they are not) refugees.
Hello mugsy's cat !..cute name.
 |
|
JK2006 |
My appeal is ongoing. I'm considered a Low Risk offender. Feed the rodents. |
|
mugsy's cat |
JK2006 wrote:
Just did a piece on Sky News about this;
You are on it for life, because you have ruined the lives of so many young boys. You are considered an ongoing risk to young males. I note your failure to appeal, as an admission of guilt. You will never have freedom from the police.
You are known to them as a "High Risk Offender"!
Inshallah. |
|
|
|
