cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: News of the World arrests
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
DJones Hugh Grant's article is now online:

The bugger, bugged

"Thosa are the highlights. As I drove home past the white cliffs, I thought it was interesting - apart from the fact that Paul hates people like me, and I hate people like him, we got on quite well. And, absurdly, I felt a bit guilty for recording him.

And he does have a very nice pub. The Castle Inn, Dover, for the record. There are rooms available, too. He asked me if I'd like to sample the honeymoon suite some time: "I can guarantee your privacy.""
veritas story just gets more fascinating...


'Hugh Grant secretly tapes damning allegations from former News of the World journalist'


www.thefirstpost.co.uk/77407,people,news...-daily#ixzz1IpxlAyy6
veritas fruitlessly searching the Aussie newspapers for a mention of this tale. The fact they are all owned by Rupert Murdoch is entirely co-incidental.

plenty of mentions on the government ABC network. Ignored elsewhere.
david JK2006 wrote:
So the front page story in the Guardian (anti Murdoch) is buried tiny inside the Sun and Times (Murdoch owned - like the News of the World)

I've noticed all through this case that some papers are conspicuous by their silence on the issue. I read the Times a few days a week through dogwalking for a friend and any time the Guardian and BBC* are running with the story, the Times will have a vague mention on page 23.

* worth noting that the BBC is up with the Guardian on this story in terms of coverage, tho maybe their reasons are a bit transparent.
JK2006 But the Mail? Buries it away too. Wonder if it's a bit too close to home.