IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: perhaps veritas can answer this ? Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
veritas
In The Know wrote: veritas wrote: as it would mean suddenly around £57million being taken out of the economy every week
No it wouldn't - we PUT IN that money to start with (its not free you know LOL !)
Yes it would. It's taxpayer's money being re-distributed to almost a million that you have identified (let alone all the others).
If it wasn't pumped back into the economy small business would plummet ( as would many others-utilities and so on).
In fact I was staggered to read how little unemployment payments are in Britain.
I have no idea how anyone survives on it.
This is really simple economics that even you should understand..afterall the Tories and (nu)Labour agree with me because they keep paying it !
you are alone on this one.
GeminiUK
Innocent Accused wrote: JK2006 wrote: Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory!
If that were the criteria then ITK would never get another post published again
Rubbing out the result is never as effective as banishing the cause.
seems to me a single person's bad manners results in 99% of the problems here.I'd like to see more specialist debates here,not stupid utterances in support of the failed governmental system we have inherited.
Innocent Accused
JK2006 wrote: Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory!
If that were the criteria then ITK would never get another post published again
Locked Out
Fair enough, I trust you removed the suggestion that prompted my words too?
JK2006
Because it was over simplified, out of context and therefore inflammatory!