cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: JK in Daily Mail
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
veritas steveimp wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Indeed - delighted and hope it may boost sales of the Kindle No1 E-Book and the views for Vile Pervert and Me Me Me.

Paedophile? Someone who finds children sexually attractive? Not me - either in fact or in the law. A child is defined as "a person under the age of 14" by the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (never repealed).


Warren Mitchell tells a story that the head of comedy at the time of the BBC (Denis Main Wilson) used to come up to him at rehearsals for Till Death Us Do Part and say "another complaint from Mary Whitehouse, another 500,000 viewers next week, keep it up"!


In The Know has stolen Warren Mitchell's act.
Prunella Minge Andy wrote:
I've finally received a response to the complaint I made to the BBC back in July:

Thanks for contacting us regarding BBC Four’s ‘Top of the Pops: 1976’ on 27 July. Please accept our apologies for the long delay in replying. We know our correspondents appreciate a quick response and are sorry you've had to wait on this occasion.

I understand you were concerned Jonathan King was edited out of this programme.

We can advise that the Director General has since replied to Jonathan King and the BBC doesn’t think it should be rewriting history so we will be showing these programmes in their entirety.

I hope this information is helpful and thanks again for taking the time to contact us.

Kind Regards

Stuart Webb

BBC Complaints

www.bbc.co.uk/complaints


Well done you!
Andy I've finally received a response to the complaint I made to the BBC back in July:

Thanks for contacting us regarding BBC Four’s ‘Top of the Pops: 1976’ on 27 July. Please accept our apologies for the long delay in replying. We know our correspondents appreciate a quick response and are sorry you've had to wait on this occasion.

I understand you were concerned Jonathan King was edited out of this programme.

We can advise that the Director General has since replied to Jonathan King and the BBC doesn’t think it should be rewriting history so we will be showing these programmes in their entirety.

I hope this information is helpful and thanks again for taking the time to contact us.

Kind Regards

Stuart Webb

BBC Complaints

www.bbc.co.uk/complaints
Blackit JK2006 wrote:
Indeed - delighted and hope it may boost sales of the Kindle No1 E-Book and the views for Vile Pervert and Me Me Me.

Paedophile? Someone who finds children sexually attractive? Not me - either in fact or in the law. A child is defined as "a person under the age of 14" by the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (never repealed).


Well said JK. It is upsetting when moronic sub-creatures abuse the English language and accuse others of being paedophiles, simply for an admission that young people over the age of 14 can be sexually attractive, or might be capable of consenting to sex. But we live in uncivilised times and there is no limit to the depths to which people are prepared to exploit real paedophilia and real child abuse in order to deal with their own disturbing inner demons.
veritas Innocent Accused wrote:
steveimp wrote:
Innocent Accused wrote:
If it wasn't for the headline the article would have been ok.
It does show that we're being monitored here by the press.....


Probably on a PC with two screens. One screen they are looking at this forum, the other screen they are looking at some hardcore Swedish pornography. Or worse.

Journos are the biggest hypocrites in the universe.

Next to Politicians.


Hardcore porn? Don't tell Veritas!


I find most hacks are either absolute cynics or more credulous than the general public

..and I.m sure consume as much porn as most teenagers do