cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Disturbing sentence in Times Law Report
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 In the decision allowing the BBC to transmit an interview with Babar Ahmad it says the Minister of Justice is "entitled to maintain a policy of normally refusing permission for the broadcasting of interviews with prisoners".

I discovered two cases - Simms/O'Brien and Hirst - where it was found by judges that prisoners MUST be allowed to give interviews to the media when protesting their innocence.

I thought this was an essential human right.

Can an expert clarify please?

www.innocent.org.uk/misc/steyn_judgment.html
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk