King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]Blackit wrote:[/b]
[quote][b]angel wrote:[/b]
[quote]May i suggest  that if views that differ from yours are perceived as ongoing feuds, you may want to stay avoid discussion boards. You clearly need your own website where everyone agrees with you. Posturing solidarity with other members against me is unfair. Thanks.[/quote]

You accused me of being 'obsessed' with the paedo angle, on a thread concerning the News of the World hacking into the phone of a murdered kid, as well as a murdered kid's relatives, an obscene criminal act which had no other possible motive than to make better 'pedo' stories that the NofTW knew the British public lap up.  This in a forum which understandably has paedohysteria as a common theme, given that the board's owner's life was destroyed by it.  The board's owner is also forced to belong to a humiliating 'register' that was campaigned for by that same newspaper that was hacking into the phones of Sarah Payne's parents at the time.

Presumably you made that unwarranted and rudely presented criticism against myself because you thought other posters might also object to any 'obsessions' on this board - unless you want the content here to suit just you personally.

BTW, I could understand your original criticism if I was cluttering up the board with 10 threads a day on paedohysteria, as BR used to do with his conspiracy theories, but given that I've only posted here about 5 times in the last 6 months, and until that Milly Dowler hacking thread (which indisputably is about paedohysteria), none of those comments even mentioned the subject.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Frankie Boyle admits to being a paedophile?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
ProperGander	Hedda: It's well known in ALL of phoney Anglophonia-US/UK/CA/OZ/NZ/IE/SA. Age & Sex-obsessed, sad or what ? Blame the Anglos/Angles/Angel-boy fancing Roman Pope Gregory's 6th century envoy old hypocrite supposed 'Saint' Augustine Of Canterbury. He brainwashed Anglo-Saxons with Sex-Guilt & Just wars (oddly NOT the earlier one of 'Hippo' - WTF ?) Lol. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Canterbury
Hedda Hopper	Blacklit has a point. There is something quite weird about the British public (well a certain number of them) who show a unhealthy delight in reading about other people's woes but most especially when it comes to sex and that is evidenced by the preponderance of tabloid tales. Does it happen elsewhere?. Not to the extent as in the UK. So does it mean we are all Vile Perverts? I think the answer may be YES.
SillyBilly	Both being 'Silly Billies'.
angel	I am disagreeing with your comment sir/madam. Why you would find that a cause to rant is anyone's guess. Contrary to what you think "paedohysteria" isn't a common theme. Its one of many subjects of which are both varied and interesting and why I frequent these boards. If an alternative view to yours causes you to respond in such an abrasive manner you may want to ask yourself why you even bother.
Blackit	angel wrote: May i suggest that if views that differ from yours are perceived as ongoing feuds, you may want to stay avoid discussion boards. You clearly need your own website where everyone agrees with you. Posturing solidarity with other members against me is unfair. Thanks. You accused me of being 'obsessed' with the paedo angle, on a thread concerning the News of the World hacking into the phone of a murdered kid, as well as a murdered kid's relatives, an obscene criminal act which had no other possible motive than to make better 'pedo' stories that the NofTW knew the British public lap up. This in a forum which understandably has paedohysteria as a common theme, given that the board's owner's life was destroyed by it. The board's owner is also forced to belong to a humiliating 'register' that was campaigned for by that same newspaper that was hacking into the phones of Sarah Payne's parents at the time. Presumably you made that unwarranted and rudely presented criticism against myself because you thought other posters might also object to any 'obsessions' on this board - unless you want the content here to suit just you personally. BTW, I could understand your original criticism if I was cluttering up the board with 10 threads a day on paedohysteria, as BR used to do with his conspiracy theories, but given that I've only posted here about 5 times in the last 6 months, and until that Milly Dowler hacking thread (which indisputably is about paedohysteria), none of those comments even mentioned the subject.