IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: oh dear - mustn't upset the police, must we? Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
HaventAClue
Unoffi-shully overheard at Lord Snooty's multi-millionaire unearned privelidge coiled snakes, CONman co-ilition CONference:
" It's damned bad form for one of our chaps to call bluebottle-oiks 'Plebs'! Now, pass the Bollinger and don't spare the condoms old boy while you stick another boy on the and of that, please."
In The Know
steveimp wrote: Given what PC Simon Harwood did, I'm surprised that the Met are still talking about reputations.....
Have they forgotten the Brazilian already ???
In The Know
<<< The Police Federation and Labour both want an inquiry >>>
"official report" ?
Since when did the words of a policeman imply "official" status, or guarantee the truth?
... and of course its the paper of truth - The Sun !!!!!! - long time friends of the police (for services rendered?) - who promote such rubbish.
On LBC an Union Plod from the Met said that what the Police Officers said 'couldn't be untrue' and 'besmirches their reputation' and is asking for the Minister to resign.
Given what PC Simon Harwood did, I'm surprised that the Met are still talking about reputations.....