Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Goodness me, could Mark Williams Thomas be stretching the truth?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Jo |
MWT is apparently doing another documentary about the Jeremy Bamber case.
twitter.com/southwalesargus/status/1595099790471200770
Is Jeremy Bamber innocent? New White House Farm documentary
...Mark Williams-Thomas, a retired detective best known for exposing Jimmy Savile as a paedophile in ITV’s The Other Side of Jimmy Savile, believes the case could be one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in the UK....
A couple of people in the Twitter thread have posted the David Rose article about MWT (How a self-promoting TV detective, obsessed with celebrity sex abusers, helped police ruin the lives of Sir Cliff and a string of other famous faces... who all turned out to be TOTALLY INNOCENT), one (@InnocenceFraud) saying this:
It's a shoddy excuse for journalism when you fill copy with self promotional garbage. Newsquest made many very talented journalists redundant and now they promote this.. which when all said and done is a tool to create page impressions to sell advertising
MWT appears to be a Bamber groupie. Perhaps he's still corresponding with him and getting Christmas cards (he couldn't have blasted his family away if he sends MWT Christmas cards, could he?).
From MWT's writings:
...I first started writing to Jeremy back in early February 2012 because the case not only always fascinated me, but because I wanted to find out more about some aspects of it that did not sit comfortably with me. As a result of my contact with him and his solicitor I decided to make a programme later that year, which focused specifically on the issues of the moderator and the burn marks on the back of Neville Bamber, Jeremy's dad. The programme rated very well, watched by over 3.4 million with 17% share. Since then I have been writing to Jeremy every 4 or 5 months, and he always sends me a Christmas card....
www.scribd.com/document/459368124/Mark-W...r-Innocent-or-Guilty
I think this is another pitch for ratings and adulation from groupies (of MWT and Bamber) by yet again ghoulishly and pointlessly poking around in a case that has been solved and pouring salt in a family's wounds. |
|
Green Man |
Jo wrote:
Man who exposed paedophile Jimmy Savile says data shows Madeleine McCann ‘dead in 72 hours’
He has apparently been speaking on a podcast and at a conference hosted by the FBI.
He didn't expose Savile. There were rumours when he was alive and the nurses, I spoke who worked at Stoke Mandeville said he liked prolonged hugs and a little handsy but never fully grope them. Savile was also questioned by police but was let go.
Maybe he was protected by the establishment and did things with children etc, but we will never the true story.
You got my truth, your truth and the actual truth. |
|
Jo |
Man who exposed paedophile Jimmy Savile says data shows Madeleine McCann ‘dead in 72 hours’
He has apparently been speaking on a podcast and at a conference hosted by the FBI. |
|
J devereux |
Hes no good now he's messing up McCann case.
He's dangerous. |
|
Randall |
My sympathies on the death of a loved one. However, details about what actually happened here are a bit thin.
Christopher & Robert wrote:
On 30th November 2015 myself and my partner of 37 years, Robert, were arrested on what are now proven malicious knowingly false allegations.
What were these allegations, who made them and how were they proved to be both false and malicious?
The penny dropped just yesterday that Mark Williams-Thomas connection to the PCC who also sent malicious communications about us early into the investigation to our LibDem campaign manager Mr. Phillip Dunn.
What malicious communications did he send?Have you actually seen the content or does the phrase "the penny dropped" indicate that you've surmised the existence and content of the messages?
Our entire lives, careers and reputations have been totally destroyed by this INTERNATIONAL SUPER TROLL GANG all connected to Mark Williams-Thomas !
Only if you let them. The criminal stuff has come to nothing: others don't have such luck. Anyway, it pales in comparison to bereavement, which might of course not have been caused or exacerbated by the criminal matters at all. Why not take a leaf out of Harvey Proctor's or Jonathan King's book and strike back? You say you've been falsely accused and proveably so. Post your proof on a website, a Facebook page, letters to the newspaper, edits to the relevant Wikipedia pages. Name names. |
|
|
|
