IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Please explain... Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
In The Know
Angel wrote: I am flabbergasted that everyone talking about JS on all forms of media is assuming his guilt. Not one outlet has him as "alleged". That cant be right? Why has no one questioned this? We live in frightening times.
Those days are gone, angel.
Even Cameron last week suggested that where we cannot get a conviction (presumably because there is no evidence !!!) we should still find a way to punish the accused (he didn't exactly use those words - but thats what he meant)!
In The Know
JK2006 wrote: We believe them because they are all saying the same thing," he said."
... and they are all reading the same papers (and ringing the same lawyers !)
Sgt Plod
Angel wrote: I am flabbergasted that everyone talking about JS on all forms of media is assuming his guilt. Not one outlet has him as "alleged". That cant be right? Why has no one questioned this? We live in frightening times.
that goes for the finest in blue...confirming guilt even before they have reviewed the evidence.
I have a feeling this is going to end very badly for a lot of people..(not Savile of course)..but some accusers will be found to be fakes, some (high profile ) yapping to the media with egg on their face..lawsuits a plenty on all sides (Fred Star should make a motza but looks like he might expire before he collects..high blood pressure?)
BasilBrushOff
Sweet Angel.
U nailed it, frightening times - for Scaredy Cats.
Keep On Blogging.
Power To THE PEOPLES' WEB, Above Which NO ONE Stands !
LoL.
Angel
I am flabbergasted that everyone talking about JS on all forms of media is assuming his guilt. Not one outlet has him as "alleged". That cant be right? Why has no one questioned this? We live in frightening times.