IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Media murder; now a "good story" kills people. Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Freddie Parrot Face Davies
Sick Sick Sick - s U c K s U c K s U c K.
Hedda
this is a new phenomena with a while to run yet...even the dead are not safe.
by accepting claims from 40 years ago, they are opening the way for historic abuse blaming the dead, especially the rich and famous.
and they will stay 'they are so brave coming forwards'..brave?..why ? they can remain anonymous.
JK2006
So who is responsible for killing those Leeds future heart patients?
We are. We who buy newspapers, watch TV, listen to the radio and demand A GOOD STORY.
And our media, who choose to publish without responsibility or thought for consequences.
This lack of regard means they are allowed (by us, our judges, our politicians) to give us good stories, whether or not they are true.
Yes there are libel laws etc to protect some living but not, of course, for the dead.
And when we react according to media rules, the inevitable ramifications cause death and destruction.
Like those poor Leeds soon-to-be corpses whose lives would have been saved by the monies donated for research and facilities by Jimmy Savile.
In The Know
Blackit wrote: Meanwhile, Daft David is busy selling instruments of death to autocratic Gulf states :