cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Is this the next Wrongly Accused to be set free?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
GeminiUK Innocent Accused wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Rather amusing journalist's name considering the case.

And worse could be shortened to 'Al Gore'


Wasn't that Al Bore?
Innocent Accused JK2006 wrote:
Rather amusing journalist's name considering the case.

And worse could be shortened to 'Al Gore'
JK2006 Rather amusing journalist's name considering the case.
Innocent Accused www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2242191...s-5-prostitutes.html

I was never convinced of his guilt.Lots of circumstantial,but nothing really convincing that proved beyond doubt.
These trials are often too complex for 'layman jury' to fully appreciate,and as in my own case the amount of money for specialists available on legal aid is negligible.
Will be interesting.