King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]Chris Retro wrote:[/b]
[quote]In an interesting twist, charges that were dropped against Michael Le Vell have been unearth and pressed due to a "public interest" element. However, every cloud and all that....

CORONATION STREET actually has a history of child abuse. Google PETER ADAMSON and go from there. Kevin Webster has been on screen for 30 years. Now he's been charged we must BELIEVE THE VICTIMS and the show must come off the air FORTHWITH to spare the VICTIMS more DISTRESS. I hereby demand Mark WIlliams-Thomas investigates the shows history of CHILD ABUSE and GRANADA & ITV's attitudes to child protection. "EXPOSED - THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET" has to be made now.

Seriously, we must charge in and demand this.
We need to petition the slimeball arsehole to investigate YEARS of child abuse amongst the cast, and the CULTURE of abuse harvested by Granada & ITV. I mean REALLY PETITION for "EXPOSED - THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET" to be made and aired. Let's have a trawl thru 52 years of cast members past & present. Let's have a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD.

Or, as this is extremely unlikely and lots of his co-stars have already spoke out in his defence (and therefore AGAINST THE BLESSED VICTIMS) is this THE ROPE WITH WHICH OUR FEARLESS HAND-WRINGING DEFECTIVE DETECTIVE HANGS HIMSELF?[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Kevin Webster
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Ben 9	In The Know wrote: A photographer friend told me that no one would do any glamour shots with anyone - male or female Business quiet then ITK?
Anonymous	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Michael Le Vell is not allowed unsupervised contact with children under fourteen as part of his bail conditions. news.sky.com/story/1057580/coronation-st...ael-le-vell-in-court Fourteen? Why not sixteen? How can this possibly make sense? Maybe the judge believed he was innocent and felt sorry for him, so was trying to be as lenient as possible...
Alan Farque	He's clearly guilty, so just send him to Australia and move on!
Chris Retro	I just hope for his sake Mr Le Vell has never had his photo taken with Jimmy Savile.
In The Know	JK2006 wrote: Definition of a child according to the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - "a person under 14". But, for media purposes, let's admit we are all children... of our parents. A photographer friend told me that no one would do any glamour shots with anyone - male or female - under 18. The law is too vague apparently.