King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]Chris Retro wrote:[/b]
[quote]Ben - I speak with irony. There were NO ALLEGATIONS about TOTP in it's lifetime and yet here we are in 2013 and - thanks to Mark Hand-Wringer & his employers at ITV the repeat run has been WRECKED and the show besmirched by lies. A dead man has been made a demon - and there is NO WAY BACK.
Now he, you and the rest of the "Have It Both Ways" population want this latest thing buried as if "it's different"?

My point isn't the destruction of Le Vell - the whole "drop the charges then take them up again 16 months later" is the clearest indication yet that this Witch Hunt against men is operating outside of the law. Le Vell himself is quite obviously mincemeat now.
The point is ITV & MWT must FALL ON THEIR SWORDS. The hysteria created by THEM but now be applied to their own.

Failure to do that is admission that SAVILEGATE is an anti-BBC trawl as much as it is ANTI-MEN.

We must "BELIEVE THE VICTIMS ALLEGATIONS" they bleat day after day after day.

Well, using that belief we must now "believe" that everything to do with CORONATION STREET will send shudders of fear & revulsion through the POOR MITES. Therefore, ITV must take the whole show off the air.

Contrary to popular belief, people CANNOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

Not even ITV viewers.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Kevin Webster
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Ben 9	In The Know wrote: A photographer friend told me that no one would do any glamour shots with anyone - male or female Business quiet then ITK?
Anonymous	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Michael Le Vell is not allowed unsupervised contact with children under fourteen as part of his bail conditions. news.sky.com/story/1057580/coronation-st...ael-le-vell-in-court Fourteen? Why not sixteen? How can this possibly make sense? Maybe the judge believed he was innocent and felt sorry for him, so was trying to be as lenient as possible...
Alan Farque	He's clearly guilty, so just send him to Australia and move on!
Chris Retro	I just hope for his sake Mr Le Vell has never had his photo taken with Jimmy Savile.
In The Know	JK2006 wrote: Definition of a child according to the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - "a person under 14". But, for media purposes, let's admit we are all children... of our parents. A photographer friend told me that no one would do any glamour shots with anyone - male or female - under 18. The law is too vague apparently.