cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Kevin Webster
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Ben 9 In The Know wrote:

A photographer friend told me that no one would do any glamour shots with anyone - male or female


Business quiet then ITK?
Anonymous honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Michael Le Vell is not allowed unsupervised contact with children under fourteen as part of his bail conditions. news.sky.com/story/1057580/coronation-st...ael-le-vell-in-court

Fourteen? Why not sixteen? How can this possibly make sense?


Maybe the judge believed he was innocent and felt sorry for him, so was trying to be as lenient as possible...
Alan Farque He's clearly guilty, so just send him to Australia and move on!
Chris Retro I just hope for his sake Mr Le Vell has never had his photo taken with Jimmy Savile.
In The Know JK2006 wrote:
Definition of a child according to the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - "a person under 14".

But, for media purposes, let's admit we are all children... of our parents.

A photographer friend told me that no one would do any glamour shots with anyone - male or female - under 18. The law is too vague apparently.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk