IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: R.I.P Men Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Anonymous
JK2006 wrote: One of my wrongful convictions was for touching a young man's knee (he originally claimed to have been twelve but changed the dates when we proved he would have been 16 or 17 at the time he claimed - if I'd ever met him... I hadn't) - 6 months.
Chris - I think you're right; men are becoming redundant to our species (AI is replacing us) but I think it's sex that will die out first. However, we shall see claims made against women soon... "she raped me when I was 13 and didn't want to have sex with an older woman..."
I wonder how she'll react if it's someone who's always said "always believe the claimant"?
I didn't know touching someone's knee was a crime and I certainly never realised there was a minimum age at which you could do it.
Thanks for the warning, lol
Hedda
heard a very interesting interview with writer Steve Biddulph whose new book Raising Girls will be a multi-million seller like Raising Boys was.
he interviewed many advertising executives who to a man..pin-pointed the day when they decided to concentrate on young girls and if they could fill them with uncertainties about their looks, dress sense, sexuality etc, they had a captive market for at least 12 years.
It really is a form of abuse..convincing great swathes of people they have a problem and must buy a certain product in order to survive child-hood....but it shows that the thinking was so different in the past and acceptable.
ie : Jimmy Savile's (and a million other men) alleged 'seductions' of teen girls was the norm and in fact actively encouraged by publications like The Sun.."Cor Blimey Look at the Knockers on this 17 Year Old Star Bird" and so on..
Jim
I don't think they said always believe the claimant. They said always believe the woman / child. Still, that's a male child you're talking about but boys will have it rougher in any contest.
JK2006
One of my wrongful convictions was for touching a young man's knee (he originally claimed to have been twelve but changed the dates when we proved he would have been 16 or 17 at the time he claimed - if I'd ever met him... I hadn't) - 6 months.
Chris - I think you're right; men are becoming redundant to our species (AI is replacing us) but I think it's sex that will die out first. However, we shall see claims made against women soon... "she raped me when I was 13 and didn't want to have sex with an older woman..."
I wonder how she'll react if it's someone who's always said "always believe the claimant"?
Chris Retro
I've pondered on this long time.
Given that the engulfing Tidal Wave of the Sea Of Bullshit is now seeing 'historic allegations' reach epidemic proportions, should we be calling for guidelines in how men are expected to defend against these if they arise?
Seriously, are we to avoid contact with others completely on account of being 'Beasts With Penis'?
ITV, the Gutter Press and other trash media have indoctrinated women into believing consent can wthdrawn on a whim years laters, that touching someone's right knee is an arrestable offence 40 years later, and that anything they say must be believed no matter what. Are we just sitting targets, famous or not? Where is our protection?
Should we amputate the penis' of baby boys to prevent them offending in the future, and create Lab-Sperm available to any woman whenever she wants to sprog? After all, children are a woman's birth-right and men are basically useless scum, right?