cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Jim Davidson re-arrested
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Beaver Agreed
Anonymous In The Know wrote:
Chris Retro wrote:
for me though the targeting of both Clifford & Davidson who, for all their many faults, were indeed the two people who voiced objections to Yewtree 'as a witch hunt' early on


..... good "cover" ?


Could be, maybe Max Clifford doth protest to much? Or maybe he should just have kept his mouth shut...

It is weird, if any of these guys had done anything serious, the accusers all wait till now. to all at once make their complaints. They could have reported these guys anytime if the allegations were true and they thought them serious enough to report...
honey!oh sugar sugar. In The Know wrote:
Chris Retro wrote:
for me though the targeting of both Clifford & Davidson who, for all their many faults, were indeed the two people who voiced objections to Yewtree 'as a witch hunt' early on


..... good "cover" ?


And perhaps a warning?
In The Know Chris Retro wrote:
for me though the targeting of both Clifford & Davidson who, for all their many faults, were indeed the two people who voiced objections to Yewtree 'as a witch hunt' early on


..... good "cover" ?
Anonymous Chris Retro wrote:
It's a deeply sinister operation - for me though the targeting of both Clifford & Davidson who, for all their many faults, were indeed the two people who voiced objections to Yewtree 'as a witch hunt' early on is one of the most serious aspects of this. It's as if they really do have a 'zero tolerance' to any criticism, and really did target the individuals concerned to fulfil a criteria.
And yet, for all the elements of stupidity in both Yewtree and the demonisation of Savile even the normally satirical and trustworthy elements of the media like Private Eye seem to be reluctant to call a spade a spade. All these months later and no proof whatsoever - and yet the only real cognitive criticism seems to be coming from the Anna Raccoon camp, the excellent Moor Larkin, Steve Moxon, myself, a few choice forums such as this one and a handful of rebelious real journalists who aren't attached to any particular publication and can thus afford to be subjective.
All your presenter, dj's, musicians etc who privately think what the above are daring to say are simply keeping quiet so that they don't get dragged into the career-ending circus of death.


It's the height of stupidity. They need telling a few home truths.

Even if the accusation against Freddie Starr was true, it wouldn't make him a paedophile, and it does seem that people like Peter Rippon were able to recognise that during the discussions about the Newsnight thing, but he has been shouted down - suffered for his sanity, lol