IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Tory Bollocks Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
honey!oh sugar sugar.
In The Know wrote: True wrote: the Mail yesterday mentioned he wanted his Mistresses kids back because they were worth £1000pm.
His "mistress" had left (taking her five kids with her).
Thats alot of scratchcard money to lose for someone like Philpott.
He planned the fire to blame her, and hoped she'd be convicted so he could claim the kids (and the money !!!!) back.
As the primary carer looking after the siblings he was almost certain to get custody anyway.
True
It really does pain me to say it,but I really do think ITK has won this argument
In The Know
True wrote: the Mail yesterday mentioned he wanted his Mistresses kids back because they were worth £1000pm.
His "mistress" had left (taking her five kids with her).
Thats alot of scratchcard money to lose for someone like Philpott.
He planned the fire to blame her, and hoped she'd be convicted so he could claim the kids (and the money !!!!) back.
In The Know
Solihull Exile wrote: And where is ITK? Time to leave the igloo,and rejoin the almost human race.
Oh dear, ... I only just return and find myself agreeing with Solihull Exile !
I'm starting to feel quite faint !
In The Know
hedda wrote: no the main reason is that both left and right political parties in Australia maintained Keynsian style strict controls over the financial sector, banks and so on.
unlike the UK which under Nu Labour adopted the 'free market' fantasies of Regan / Thatcher/ Bush.
... ane B-Lair ? Brown ?
AT LAST you admit that those in charge of the economy for the last 18 years (till the crash) ARE actually responsible !