King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Blaming others.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
hedda	haven't you watched Bondi Rescue ? There are lifesavers all over the place. The amount of swimmers dragged from the surf is staggering. Only takes a minute to drown.
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Dawn Morning wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: if I fainted in the water or something best idea you've had on here sugar good luck Thank you, Dawn Moaning. As charming as ever, I see.
Dawn Morning	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: if I fainted in the water or something best idea you've had on here sugar good luck
honey!oh sugar sugar.	andrew wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Ben 9 wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: I wouldn't call a lifeguard on duty "in loco parentis" Of course he/she is - to ensure water safety. Like lolipop men and women are there to ensure road safety. The lifeguard has a specific duty to all swimmers,and no more,but someone in loco parentis has a responsibility to care for the child as a reasonable parent would. I do think you probably need more lifeguards than usual in a wave area,because it is very easy to get into difficulty, but with the layout of that particular pool with the slides and underwater tunnels it would be impossible to monitor everyone anyway. Ban swimming then Well, we all take slight risks all the time and I haven't suggested it is a good idea to do otherwise, but I see lifeguards as a bonus (might be handy if I fainted in the water or something)not an excuse to behave irresponsibly.
andrew	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Ben 9 wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: I wouldn't call a lifeguard on duty "in loco parentis" Of course he/she is - to ensure water safety. Like lolipop men and women are there to ensure road safety. The lifeguard has a specific duty to all swimmers,and no more,but someone in loco parentis has a responsibility to care for the child as a reasonable parent would. I do think you probably need more lifeguards than usual in a wave area,because it is very easy to get into difficulty, but with the layout of that particular pool with the slides and underwater tunnels it would be impossible to monitor everyone anyway. Ban swimming then