King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: journo accesses pedo porn
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
hedda	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: It appears that the film she watched featured adult actors and the actress was portraying an eighteen year old. www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/2013/05/29/pla...ial-porn-video-nsfw/ doesn't matter..it's disgusting. There is no excuse - producing dirty filthy sexy tales about schoolgirls and posing older actresses to look like schoolgirls in fishnets and so on...something should be done about it or it will end up invading our family newspapers.
honey!oh sugar sugar.	It appears that the film she watched featured adult actors and the actress was portraying an eighteen year old. www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/2013/05/29/pla...ial-porn-video-nsfw/
JK2006	Correct Hedda and a quite extraordinary display of stupidity prompted, I'm sure, by the Mail "We must stamp out online porn" crusade...
hedda	bh wrote: Why would they need to research such a thing? Why is it on the internet to start with, is the biggest question that should be asked. Isn't there an Internet police force, that trawls the net & closes down such sites & arrests that people, that put them there? There should be. Perhaps the Glitter was also doing research? Possible. Or the fella at PC World (well he looked at it) so he's questionable too. Mizz Platell must be arrested and charged or she is now paving the way for a similar excuse that can be used by accused persons. She must be registered as a 'sex offender". This will confirm one thing that I am sure JK will confirm : journalists can be naive and often thick as s*it and have a tendency to believe their limited powers confers special status upon them.
bh	Why would they need to research such a thing? Why is it on the internet to start with, is the biggest question that should be asked. Isn't there an Internet police force, that trawls the net & closes down such sites & arrests that people, that put them there? There should be. Perhaps the Glitter was also doing research? Possible. Or the fella at PC World (well he looked at it) so he's questionable too.