IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: a man after ITK's heart Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
hedda
In The Know wrote: hedda wrote:
Indeed they do !
government subsidised privately owned housing. We taxpayers are subsidising the build-up of private assets.
Corporate welfare run riot. That is the problem.
For once you are right (about the problem) hedda-tas ... but as usual you get the solution wrong !
The solution is to let people live where they can AFFORD to live !
(Its rather nice, I'm told, in South Shields and they already have a loony MP to look after their interests) !!!
social engineering ?
I loved NY & London when they were a real mix of people from all walks of life.
now the nouveau riche quite out me off my champers.
In The Know
hedda wrote:
Indeed they do !
government subsidised privately owned housing. We taxpayers are subsidising the build-up of private assets.
Corporate welfare run riot. That is the problem.
For once you are right (about the problem) hedda-tas ... but as usual you get the solution wrong !
The solution is to let people live where they can AFFORD to live !
(Its rather nice, I'm told, in South Shields and they already have a loony MP to look after their interests) !!!
In The Know
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Keep up, ITK. They have put them all in Belgravia and Mayfair.
Not for long, honey, not for long !!!
Whats wrong with Stoke On Trent anyway ?
honey!oh sugar sugar.
In The Know wrote: hedda wrote: but I didn't say there should be no property developers.
"dolers" could live in government built housing..
... but they already live in government financed housing, dont they ?
Keep up, ITK. They have put them all in Belgravia and Mayfair.
hedda
In The Know wrote: hedda wrote: but I didn't say there should be no property developers.
"dolers" could live in government built housing..
... but they already live in government financed housing, dont they ?
Indeed they do !
government subsidised privately owned housing. We taxpayers are subsidising the build-up of private assets.
Corporate welfare run riot. That is the problem. It will get worse with the economic illiterate Osborne wanting to subsidise private home ownership just as Oz governments have done for decades and created the property prices more expensive than NY.