King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: The Unions are starting to pull Silliband's strings !
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
In The Know	In The Know wrote: Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps said Mr Watson's resignation was a "clear vote of no confidence in Ed Miliband's weak leadership from the man he brought in to run his [election] campaign. But this still doesn't change the fact that Len McCluskey's Unite union is taking over the Labour Party". www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23192888 Silliband should "not apologise" - says Harriet Harman (the women's lib campaigner UNTIL her husband needed a "safe" seat LOL !) www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23999869 It's a good thing (for Labour) that their supporters are too dumb to notice or understand !
In The Know	In The Know wrote: These unions are rich and powerful - if they think they have the answers why dont THEY risk their money and start enterprises? Was the question too hard for you Hedda-tas ? == "Let's ask what has changed since yesterday. Will the unions still have the biggest vote at the (loony) conference? Yes. Will they still be able to determine the party's policy? Yes. Will they still have the decisive vote in voting for the Labour leader? Yes. That is the fact. They own you lock, stock and block vote." - David Cameron at PMQ's
In The Know	hedda wrote: I had a good friend whose father ran a huge corporation in Frankfurt and on visits over dinner he would explain the meetings he had with union bosses....there was none of the animosity we witness in the UK or USA... Maybe their unions dont have the "chip on their shoulder" mentality that ours do? Our Unions are incapable of building anything - they want to bring everything down to the lowest possible demoninator. These unions are rich and powerful - if they think they have the answers why dont THEY risk their money and start enterprises?
hedda	SuchGoodPoints wrote: Mark our words. 11-plus ITK doesn't even know. That Europe's postwar economic and industrial leader Germany has proven time and again. That cohesive unions are good things, while divisive aristocracies are historically bad for all societies. I had a good friend whose father ran a huge corporation in Frankfurt and on visits over dinner he would explain the meetings he had with union bosses....there was none of the animosity we witness in the UK or USA...just everyone working out the best way in which they could all benefit...none of this "we bosses must become imensley rich and the workers will get the crumbs" type thinking... mind you he did say the English were bonkers..or used a German word I cannot remember meaning the same...ITK's face came to mind as he said it
SuchGoodPoints	Mark our words. 11-plus ITK doesn't even know. That Europe's postwar economic and industrial leader Germany has proven time and again. That cohesive unions are good things, while divisive aristocracies are historically bad for all societies.