IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Jill Dando murder witness: "Police IGNORED my evidence" Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
honey!oh sugar sugar.
In The Know wrote: JK2006 wrote: Agreed ITK but he DIDNT wait - he came forward and was ignored.
I'd have been far more impressed by my false accusers if they had complained at the time but they didn't; not only that, they came back again and again.
Mmmm ... he waited for the police to contact him (apparently), then, sat back and said nothing (to anyone) throughout the much-publicised trial and TWO appeals ?
Its bit daft to broadcast his name and whereabouts if he thinks he is a witness and the killer is loose.
In The Know
JK2006 wrote: Agreed ITK but he DIDNT wait - he came forward and was ignored.
I'd have been far more impressed by my false accusers if they had complained at the time but they didn't; not only that, they came back again and again.
Mmmm ... he waited for the police to contact him (apparently), then, sat back and said nothing (to anyone) throughout the much-publicised trial and TWO appeals ?
JK2006
The problem with the age of consent thing is that, absurdly, when I was young there WAS no age of consent for same sex love. It was either a crime (male) or didn't exist (female).
Then, as I reached my mid twenties, they made it legal for males over 21 which I, as a bisexual male, found absurd since girls were legally able to consent at 16. I know women are considered far more mature than men, but 16 as opposed to 21? Really!
Sure enough, 2 days after my arrest the ages of consent were equalised at 16. Co-incidence?
honey!oh sugar sugar.
JK2006 wrote: Agreed ITK but he DIDNT wait - he came forward and was ignored.
I'd have been far more impressed by my false accusers if they had complained at the time but they didn't; not only that, they came back again and again.
So either they were enjoying themselves enormously OR what they (30 years later) said was happening WASN'T.
Or it would have been apparent that some were of the age of consent!
JK2006
Agreed ITK but he DIDNT wait - he came forward and was ignored.
I'd have been far more impressed by my false accusers if they had complained at the time but they didn't; not only that, they came back again and again.
So either they were enjoying themselves enormously OR what they (30 years later) said was happening WASN'T.