King of Hits.co.uk - Tipsheet Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

Tipsheet

Tipsheet Messageboard

Post a new message in "Tipsheet Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Mercury Winners - Young Fathers - any good?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: Long before that; we're talking 60s Honey. I know. I'm only teasing. I rather liked the wigs actually.
JK2006	Long before that; we're talking 60s Honey.
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: Different coloured eyes are a turn off Honey! You should have blindfolded him. He might have blindfolded himself if it was the fuzzy coloured wig period!
JK2006	Different coloured eyes are a turn off Honey!
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: Thank you Honey but I see them as collections of singles! I did enter Earth To King for the Mercurys. It was laughed off. I still think it's way better (and certainly more original) than most winners. Who else writes and sings songs about buggering boys and Harold Shipman? Don't get me wrong there. Nothing inappropriate with the good doctor. No. A "collection of singles" is put together randomly (usually) whereas an album is selected to slowly change the mood and tell a story, so the films are (accidentally) more like albums (as they should be) than singles. Each song is enhanced by the one before. If Bowie wasn't good enough for you then poor old Shipman wouldn't stand much chance!