Home Forums |
|
|
Topic History of: The Vacancy change name to go:audio - not bad but not quite as good... Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Martin |
Actually, 3rd listen, and it is now excellent in my book.
A hit. |
Martin |
Easy answer Kev, the same as I do, "Yes, can I help you?". |
Kev |
I saw this photocopy paper the other day made by a company called "Yes". What a terrible name for a company, how do you think they answer the phone?
Yes? |
Not In The Know |
JK2006 wrote:
[quote]I rather fear they may have slipped up on timing but they sound OK.
I don't hear the hits they had before but this is adequate soft rock/pop, good vocal, pleasant album track.
My problem with it is it hasn't got the crisp, American quality sound the earlier stuff had.
See what you think. Will there be a Vacancy in the scene in 2007 for go:audio?
www.myspace.com/goaudioband
I think they had such a great sound before, and a batch of real quality hit records (which is obviously what enticed Raphael to get the cheque book out) can't see why the change in direction, sounds like a vacancy at White Rabbit waiting to happen. |
Martin |
Having named many bands myself, I have a rule which I apply to the task.
How is this name going to sound when I ring a client?
With the case of "Go Audio", I would worry on a cold call to a gig, you will sound like a PA company trying to get work and introduce yourself.
No problem with "The Vacancy", that an obvious band name.
Can you imagine the first guy assigned to get a gig for "Kajagoogoo"?
But still, my favourite disastrous name has to go to "Call Centre". How to get your client to instantly hang up or what! |
|
|
|