Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Intel SuperGroup competition
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Big End |
and further Mart, what the hell are people thinking in terms of "five years"? The rate things are changing, it's hard to see five months down the line. |
|
Big End |
I find Zooloo rather refreshing. In fact, the name reminds me of being caught short at Chester many moons ago, but that is a different matter.
The new "mid range" labels are in the making as we discuss all this stuff...it's happening now. Lean, scaled down, artistic control, low overheads blah, blah. |
|
Mart |
Quite well illustrated there by Zoo as well.
Whats more, is we are stuck with endless 5 year plans causing further slumps with the introduction of the 360 deal.
It seems to all have to be either all encompassing, massive, or non existent in the majors, one could say it allways was, but the over muscling in of "watch out here come the professionals!", is genuinely destructive in a time in which creation is available to so many.
We so nearly have corporate run ears in line with Murdoch tv.
How fitting, if it does not work, which I think it won`t ..Kaboom! |
|
zooloo |
SW wrote:
Zooloo, you are insufferably negative about everything. I pity you.
What was negative in my post?
The industry cry of "It's all the fault of illegal downloads" is a red herring.
If sales are up or down depends on which 5 year period you pick - the last 5 it's down, the mid to late 90s it's up, previous 5 down, previous 5 up.
The problem is the industry is itself and the product it is releasing. Unless the industry accepts it's own role and shortcomings it will continue to decline.
Recognising the negative is positive, ignoring it is negative. |
|
SW |
Zooloo, you are insufferably negative about everything. I pity you. |
|
|
|
