cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Tipsheet Messageboard
Post a new message in "Tipsheet Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Grammys - controversy
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 I always used to feel, when I was in the music industry, that when Awards shows heavily featured women, it was indicative that the true mass appeal talent pool was shrinking that year. Positive discrimination can take over when genuine populism fades. Despite some of the greatest past performers being female (Aretha, Gladys, Dusty) most mass appeal stuff tends to be made by males. Taylor, Billy and the rest will not be getting heard or played in a decade whilst Beatles, Stones, Elvis, Bruce and others will go on across the globe.