King of Hits.co.uk - Tipsheet Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

Tipsheet

Tipsheet Messageboard

Post a new message in "Tipsheet Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]JK2006 wrote:[/b]
[quote]http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/my-weird-week-on-la-croisette-2287164.html

And my letter to Simon Kelner, the Editor of the Moon - oops - Independent...

Dear Simon; I see, yet again, Rob Sharp is describing me as "disgraced".
Not in my eyes - not in the eyes of my friends - not in the eyes of the lawyers pursuing my appeal for wrongful conviction. 
Of course, in Mail world (which the paper now inhabits), someone convicted is forever damned unless he or she can prove his or her innocence. Indeed, poor Ken Clarke gets monstered by the media for daring to suggest there are degrees of rape - let alone very rare miscarriages of justice.
I do understand the desire to avoid mentioning my name and offending so many gullible readers. Even though - were I Editor (God forbid - of a paper once considering JSP worthy of such a role) - I would consider inclusion to be based on merit, few these days have the brain or balls to dare do so.
But I am not "disgraced". I'm doing fine, thank you - to the chagrin of many.

Jonathan King[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: More Independent/Rob Sharp publicity
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author

Message

JK2006

www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment...oisette-2287164.html

And my letter to Simon Kelner, the Editor of the Moon - oops - Independent...

Dear Simon; I see, yet again, Rob Sharp is describing me as "disgraced".
Not in my eyes - not in the eyes of my friends - not in the eyes of the lawyers pursuing my appeal for wrongful conviction.
Of course, in Mail world (which the paper now inhabits), someone convicted is forever damned unless he or she can prove his or her innocence. Indeed, poor Ken Clarke gets monstered by the media for daring to suggest there are degrees of rape - let alone very rare miscarriages of justice.
I do understand the desire to avoid mentioning my name and offending so many gullible readers. Even though - were I Editor (God forbid - of a paper once considering JSP worthy of such a role) - I would consider inclusion to be based on merit, few these days have the brain or balls to dare do so.
But I am not "disgraced". I'm doing fine, thank you - to the chagrin of many.

Jonathan King