Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Diana's "death" - new "information" ?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Pattaya |
Chris Retro wrote:
Her death was the catalyst for the infantilisation of Great Britain. A cloud of idiocy descended on the nation that day, and has gotten worse. The primary school children of 1997 are barely any more mature emotionally than they were then - in fact they may well be worse.
If there's any conspiracy, it's right there - the Birth of The Idiot Nation right there.
Now we can observe a generation of sexless emotional cripples painting their faces, whooping 'n' hollering, hashtagging how everything is #awesome #lovehim #loveher #gawjuss like facile feckless Americans.
Now you come to mention it... |
|
Chris Retro |
Her death was the catalyst for the infantilisation of Great Britain. A cloud of idiocy descended on the nation that day, and has gotten worse. The primary school children of 1997 are barely any more mature emotionally than they were then - in fact they may well be worse.
If there's any conspiracy, it's right there - the Birth of The Idiot Nation right there.
Now we can observe a generation of sexless emotional cripples painting their faces, whooping 'n' hollering, hashtagging how everything is #awesome #lovehim #loveher #gawjuss like facile feckless Americans. |
|
In The Know |
Mr Reason wrote:
The birthday thing is centred on the single point of a common date, one date in a possible 365, the birthday of a group of people being the same is 50% or more in a room containing 23 people.........
For your point to be valid (in Diana's case) ALL these 23 people would not only have to have a common birthday, but also be born on the same street in the same town (and all have ginger hair !)!!
There are simply FAR TOO MANY "co-incidences" in this particular case.
... and how very, very timely and convenient for the Royals ! |
|
Mr Reason |
.......and your final statement about a 30's king is why this whole silliness on conspiracy and historical hindsight is fuel to the logic minded 'rest of the world'.........they don't believe you
And in my view, you distort and misunderstand the statistics....as I am sure the majority do. The birthday thing is centred on the single point of a common date, one date in a possible 365, the birthday of a group of people being the same is 50% or more in a room containing 23 people.........so if the room or large pub or just a get together exceeds 50-60 people there is a more than believable chance of someone sharing a birthday.............
It's the pure logic and irrefutable beauty of maths that underscores humanity and life on earth, not some annonymous messageboard poster making up 'conspiracies' based on 3rd party accounts and incorrectly repeated untruths about the conspiracy subject...........
Don't get me wrong, by all means argue, but on this point of conspiracy and Diana, your can carry on barking ( mad or up the wrong tree.........it's no different) |
|
In The Know |
Mr Reason wrote:
Wiki this - Coincedence
'From a statistical perspective, coincidences are inevitable and often less remarkable than they may appear intuitively. An example is the birthday problem, where the probability of two individuals sharing a birthday already exceeds 50% with a group of only 23.[1]
True - but you are talking about a "co-incidence" amongst 23 people (and thats only just over 50%)... I am talking about a number of "co-incidences" that affect just ONE person !
You'll be telling me next that the Duke of Windsor had to resign his Kingship because he wanted to marry a divorcee .... instead of the true fact that he was forced out because he was a little too close to the Nazis ! |
|
|
|
