cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Look who's popped up !
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know hedda wrote:
Clare was spectacularly right about Iraq.

Most of the country were spectacularly right about Iraq ! (esp the Lib Dems)

I see the loonies are already out ... the stop-the-socialist-worker-sign-on-the-dole brigade !!!!
In The Know Angel wrote:
Do you have any proof to support your allegations that Syria has chemical weapons?

No - only Assad's never ending attempts to "hide and conceal" things. Why would he need to do that?

He allowed the UN to inspect - eventually (after the evidence had dissipated !)

You will remember, angel, my (principled !) stand AGAINST the Iraq war - I knew I was right - and I was.

I am just as convinced on this issue.

If it looks like a rat, acts like a rat, smells like a rat, and behaves like a rat - then it almost certainly a rat !!!!
In The Know Pattaya wrote:
Most of the Cons backed it,including Dave.Just proves how easily he can be fooled.

To be fair ... people OUGHT to have a right to believe our PM - especially over matters so serious.

Cameron would NOT have seen the evidence - just heard the pledges / promises made by our (then) Prime Minister.

I wonder why people call him B-Liar ?????
hedda Clare was spectacularly right about Iraq.

personally, anything claimed by US presidents, I think the opposite.
Angel In The Know wrote:
Clare Short !

More "woolly" thinking ...
More "cloud cuckoo land" rhetoric !

She's says we should wait - how long?
We've already been inactive for 2.5 years (causing 100,000 deaths and 2 million displaced).

The Syrian regime HAS chemical weapons - and the rebels don't.
Now, who do I think used them ?
The Syrian regime HAS rockets to deliver chemical weapons - and the rebels don't.
Now, who do I think fired them ? DOH !

She seeks to fuse Syria with Iraq (one - Bush's invasion, clearly illegal ... the other, providing humanitarian support, clearly lawful and desirable).

These people are highly dangerous - and the terror regimes (Syria / Korea etc) will run rings around them.

No wonder they are called Loonies !!!


Do you have any proof to support your allegations that Syria has chemical weapons?