cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Arabs want an attack on Damascus
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know Pattaya wrote:
Milliband wanted more proof,eg weapons inspector's reports etc.
If that proof is beyond reasonable doubt then of course vote again,


Silliband was just following orders from Russia ! (*)

The delay has allowed Assad to move and hide most of his weapons etc.

The surprise element has completely gone - he will (no doubt) move civilians INTO target areas so he can show what damage WE have done !

(*) I see Russia now say that if we attack the Syrian peace conference (which they have opposed all along !) will be "in doubt" LOL !
Pattaya In The Know wrote:
Pattaya wrote:
'Almost three-quarters of people believe MPs were right to reject UK military action in Syria, a poll commissioned by the BBC has suggested.'
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23931479


Some things are far too important to ask the ignorant man in the street.

Perhaps, before asking such questions, people should be asked if they can NAME any three MPs !!!!

(PS - The poll shows no significant "bounce" for Silliband !)


It's called democracy,calling people silly and as such removing their right to a say in the political process ends up with a totalitarian government...like Assad,or the terror regimes who oppose him,and who you have quoted here as supporting your stance...Saudi/Qatar/UAE/Bahrain...all well proven to murder and torture their own citizens to keep themselves in power.
The world has no real appetite to get involved,only a few mad politicians...and even Obama is backtracking when asked to provide real proof to the UN.
In The Know hedda wrote:
an ex-Syrian diplomat is not a credible source and how could he be when he isn't in Syria?.

you really are talking nonsense.


A former Syrian ambassador (to London) - until a few months ago - is NOT a "credible source" (on Syria) ?

.... and I suppose your weird little blogs (which no one will read) are ?!?!

Time to get to the nursing home, hedda !
(PS they play bingo most nights !!!!)
In The Know Pattaya wrote:
'Almost three-quarters of people believe MPs were right to reject UK military action in Syria, a poll commissioned by the BBC has suggested.'
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23931479


Some things are far too important to ask the ignorant man in the street.

Perhaps, before asking such questions, people should be asked if they can NAME any three MPs !!!!

(PS - The poll shows no significant "bounce" for Silliband !)
In The Know In The Know (as always) wrote:
I would NOT be surprised if Silliband did not approach the government and ask them to re-submit the Bill - this time guaranteeing Labour support.

ITK right again !

==

In the Commons, Labour's shadow defence secretary Jim Murphy said to Mr Hammond: "After the vote, the prime minister ruled out UK involvement in military action in Syria. The government, of course, will remain engaged diplomatically and on aid policy.

"But will you spell out in what, if any, circumstances changes in Syria or internationally the government would bring back to Parliament the issue of UK military involvement in Syria?"

Mr Hammond replied: "It's a bit rich for you, who last week trooped into the lobbies behind your leader, giving rise to the very situation we now find ourselves in, to demand I tell you precisely in which circumstances we might revisit this issue.

"I've said already we believe Parliament has spoken clearly on this issue and is unlikely to want to revisit it unless the circumstances change very significantly."

all from - www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23925932