King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Michael Le Vell
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
andrew	Glad JK agrees with me he back on the cobbles by Christmas.
JK2006	I'm with Andrew all the way on this - very strange indeed; having been through a similar scenario of false allegations I can spot numerous clues that it comes from mistaken assumptions after subtle grooming by the false allegations industry, which is huge.
Tuppenceworth	Yes, wierd. What the mother believes happened should not be heard by the court because its prejudicial effect is considerable, while its probative value is nil. I also read in the newspaper (well, the Guardian...) the account of events from the prosecutor. She asserted, perhaps even with a straight face, that the defendant raped the girl while she was holding a teddy bear, but then went on to give details of the "victim's" medical examination which showed that she had never had sex. But why let such an inconvenient fact get in the way of a good headline?
honey!oh sugar sugar.	andrew wrote: This is getting too weird to be true. www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/michael-le-vell-trial-mum-2247709 Which bit is weird,Andrew? I think the intact hymen is perhaps at odds with the violence that was described previously.
andrew	This is getting too weird to be true. www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/michael-le-vell-trial-mum-2247709