King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: The Corronation street bloke
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author

Message

Mr Reason

So......if he is cleared of all charges (just now) , that means he isn't guilty....so he's been to trial over allegations specific to him where he didn't do it......so why don't we then get an examination of the reasons and evidence used by the CPS to bring the original charges.....Innocent means he hasn't done it....so by deduction the claims are false? Isn't that the logic?

So false allegations, allegeations that the CPS thought were credible and yet that a jury having heard the evidence seem to think otherwise.

The girl in question surely now needs to be examined and questioned over the allegations that appear to have taken everybody for mugs..........

For me, it doesn't follow that the allegation when proved false allow for the person making the allegation to still be annonymous........that is too much of the balance (or non balance) in the wrong direction