cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: 9/11 - the day my trial started
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
honey!oh sugar sugar. JK2006 wrote:
In 2001 - I said to my barrister "how on earth can jurors concentrate on silly things like whether or not I had sex 30 years ago when airplanes are crashing into the Twin Towers?".

He laughed and said "British Justice is not affected by minor global events".

I knew then I'd entered Wonderland.









But look at how opinion has changed in a year? Only yesterday Nigel Pivaro was on tv saying that the accused are only named publicly to fish for nutters to prop up the case, and most people seem to be in favour of anonymity for all.
Maybe next year the whole farce will have been exposed.
JK2006 No Andrew; sadly he just felt British jurors (and Judges) would not be concerned by anything outside London, let alone Great Britain.
andrew He know it was a conspiracy by saying it was minor.
JK2006 In 2001 - I said to my barrister "how on earth can jurors concentrate on silly things like whether or not I had sex 30 years ago when airplanes are crashing into the Twin Towers?".

He laughed and said "British Justice is not affected by minor global events".

I knew then I'd entered Wonderland.