Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: 8 years for videoing legal sex with girlfriend (17)
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
corevalue |
Doesn't have to be nude/provocative. It's all in the mind of the prosecutor what constitutes "erotic material". I think this report came from the US, who use the "COPINE" scale.
Level 5, Copine scale, out of 1 to 10. Think of a fully dressed "duck face" selfie of a 17 year old with a bit of cleavage visible, level 5
5 Erotic Posing Deliberately posed pictures of fully, partially clothed or naked children in sexualised or provocative poses.
We in the UK use the 5 level SAP scale.
1 Nudity or erotic posing with no sexual activity
So, the above example is still classified as child porn. |
|
Pattaya |
In The Know wrote:
Pattaya wrote:
Very true ITK, but I doubt the sentence would be the same, public opinion would be outraged.
Depends how you "sell" it ...
Innocent 17 year old seduced by man nearly TWICE HER AGE .... old enough to have been her father etc etc Obviously a pervert ! and what did he plan to do with the tapes? Mmmm ?
Get it ?
Indeed if you spin it ITK,don't think the damn Yankies even bothered to do that. |
|
In The Know |
Pattaya wrote:
Very true ITK, but I doubt the sentence would be the same, public opinion would be outraged.
Depends how you "sell" it ...
Innocent 17 year old seduced by man nearly TWICE HER AGE .... old enough to have been her father etc etc Obviously a pervert ! and what did he plan to do with the tapes? Mmmm ?
Get it ? |
|
Pattaya |
In The Know wrote:
I think you will find that much the same law applies here.
It may be legal to have sex with a 16 year old - but it IS illegal to film / photograph anyone under 18 in the nude in a provocative way - (and surely having sex would be classed as provocative?)
All part of loony paedo-hysteria !
Very true ITK,but I doubt the sentence would be the same,public opinion would be outraged. |
|
In The Know |
I think you will find that much the same law applies here.
It may be legal to have sex with a 16 year old - but it IS illegal to film / photograph anyone under 18 in the nude in a provocative way - (and surely having sex would be classed as provocative?)
All part of loony paedo-hysteria ! |
|
|
|
