Home Forums |
|
|
Topic History of: One thousand victims of Jimmy Savile Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
steveimp |
Surely this country has created enough "gangsters" over the decades with a hatred of paedophilia and child abuse that if they had heard *anything* like this directed towards Savile, they would have "done him"?
I know around here that a disabled kids charity got turned over. Lets just say that those responsible were not well for a while afterwards (and the charity got their money back.) I'm not saying that gangsters are pleasant, but they run by rules and kids are off limits. |
bh |
Chris Retro wrote:
Strange coincidences.
Observer article - a 'showcase' for the ambulance chasers of Slater & Gordon? www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/18/ji...sed-1000-victims-bbc
A company with a VESTED INTEREST in the DLT case running a completely unnecessary news headline story in a 'big news week' that basically rubbished much of the likely 'defence' of another case presently at trial
www.slatergordon.co.uk/media-centre/pres...rge-dave-lee-travis/
This bit I find quite amusing: (What is she on about "forensic" indeed?) These so called "victims" should be represented by men & not easily led Esther Teeth, soudalikes.
Liz Dux, a lawyer representing 74 of Savile's victims, said Smith had been forensic in her examination of witnesses and her report was likely to cause serious concerns for those at the top of the organisation. She said: "Every single opportunity Savile took it. He never had a quiet day basically so these numbers wouldn't at all surprise me. |
Chris Retro |
Strange coincidences.
Observer article - a 'showcase' for the ambulance chasers of Slater & Gordon? www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/18/ji...sed-1000-victims-bbc
A company with a VESTED INTEREST in the DLT case running a completely unnecessary news headline story in a 'big news week' that basically rubbished much of the likely 'defence' of another case presently at trial
www.slatergordon.co.uk/media-centre/pres...rge-dave-lee-travis/ |
bh |
65 million people in the UK. 1,000 is a small number of people, that fantasize in order to think, they might make a bit of cash for their poorly funded pension. If it mean't so much to them, why did they go to "risky" places to meet so called celebrities...when they could of been funding themselves, back in the day? Thinking the average 14 year old did a paper round, or helped the milkman. Oh yeah forgot, most of these people went to "special" schools, as they were just plain thick & people were used to their lies. So the question is...why believe them now? |
JK2006 |
Well said Chris - spot on; I knew not only most of those mentioned but executives since interviewed (very badly and one sided-ly) by Yewtree. The BBC staff simply did NOT know - and most don't believe anything was going on behind a 100% wall of silence. |
|
|
|