Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Suicide "rape" victim was NOT raped.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
In The Know |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
because it leaves no doubt that the accusers were malicious or warped rather than mistaken. (although a quick glance at other forums tells us that many think he did it but "got off"  )
Will always be the case, honey! ...... Which is why it is vital that accused keep anonymity UNTIL they have been proved guilty.
"beyond reasonable doubt"? I would suggest there is clearly a lot of doubt when it's one word against another - esp when the accusers cannot reasonably explain why they delayed complaining (and one accuser couldn't even remember when she had been raped) !!!!!!! |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
In The Know (as always) wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
But Honey, it does not appear there were any actual witnesses to it - only the "victim's" word that people saw it. Why has nobody come forward? If I'd been on a bus and seen something like that going on in a Rolls, I'd remember it forever (and would have told others about it).
I know. It does seem ridiculous that nobody would notice "Ken Barlow" waving his bits around in public but people believe what they want to believe
wrong, honey!
The Jury system works !
The Jury clearly did NOT believe the words of people who waited 30, 40, 50 years to make a complaint.
The "abuse" here is that an 81 year old - with an unblemished record - can be subjected to such a horrific public assault based on the claims of hidden anonymous people (who are keeping their motives quiet)
The DLT case will collapse almost immediately ... and they may as well not bother with Rolf Harris !
I am delighted to be proved wrong. 
I am pleased that the judge in his summing up said..
"The reality in the case is that either Mr Roache is lying or the complainants are"
because it leaves no doubt that the accusers were malicious or warped rather than mistaken. (although a quick glance at other forums tells us that many think he did it but "got off" ) |
|
In The Know (as always) |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
But Honey, it does not appear there were any actual witnesses to it - only the "victim's" word that people saw it. Why has nobody come forward? If I'd been on a bus and seen something like that going on in a Rolls, I'd remember it forever (and would have told others about it).
I know. It does seem ridiculous that nobody would notice "Ken Barlow" waving his bits around in public but people believe what they want to believe
wrong, honey!
The Jury system works !
The Jury clearly did NOT believe the words of people who waited 30, 40, 50 years to make a complaint.
The "abuse" here is that an 81 year old - with an unblemished record - can be subjected to such a horrific public assault based on the claims of hidden anonymous people (who are keeping their motives quiet)
The DLT case will collapse almost immediately ... and they may as well not bother with Rolf Harris ! |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
Hooray! Cleared of everything. I hope this means the tide is turning. |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
JK2006 wrote:
But Honey, it does not appear there were any actual witnesses to it - only the "victim's" word that people saw it. Why has nobody come forward? If I'd been on a bus and seen something like that going on in a Rolls, I'd remember it forever (and would have told others about it).
I know. It does seem ridiculous that nobody would notice "Ken Barlow" waving his bits around in public but people believe what they want to believe and there was someone in the back seat (doing nothing to help her friend)
www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bill-roach...-corrie-star-3042388 |
|
|
|
