cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: BBC discussion about pre recording victim's evidence
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 A fascinating talk about how to make it easier for victims to give evidence against the perpetrator in sex offence cases. Fascinating because they kept talking about victims and how awful and unfair it was that they could be brutally cross examined. All this in Salford, near the court where a TV actor was just acquitted of several serious charges. Why didn't they bring this up? Surely those poor, sweet, damaged young girls giving evidence in the witness box should have been protected from bullying barristers too?

Are we really totally unable to even consider that people lie about sex claims? Has society gone barking mad? You will be believed! I really think any policeman or TV presenter or politician or CPS person or hack or judge or member of the public stating "you will be believed" should have false allegations immediately made against them, so they can repeat their mantra. Max Clifford could publicise this fine campaign.