Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Waxie Maxie - dodgy defence...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Chris Retro |
JK2006 wrote:
"Good honest filth"? I must say, Waxie Maxie's defence is very odd indeed. For a skillful publicist, he's taking some very peculiar stances. And talking of peculiar stances, am I the only one wondering why he waddles in such a strange way? Piles must be a distinct possibility.
Didn't that strange Nunnmpty chap on YouTube last year claim it was due to the fact that he is nursing a permanent semi?  |
|
JK2006 |
"Good honest filth"? I must say, Waxie Maxie's defence is very odd indeed. For a skillful publicist, he's taking some very peculiar stances. And talking of peculiar stances, am I the only one wondering why he waddles in such a strange way? Piles must be a distinct possibility. |
|
In The Know |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Well, it can only be small, medium or large
... and the small ones DO get larger sometimes, honey! |
|
JK2006 |
One man or woman's small can be another's massive and, as I've said, the evidence was intended to illustrate behaviour, not detail or opinion. A foolish and misguided argument by the defence. |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
From the guardian....
"The defence counsel Richard Horwell QC told the jury there had been "contradictory" evidence about the size of Clifford's penis - ranging from claims it was "freakishly small" to others stating it was "enormous" - that had caught out prosecution witnesses"
Well, it can only be small, medium or large so you could say anything and have a one in three chance of being right and your evidence "corroborated"
the whole thing is a load of tosh! |
|
|
|
